Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 24;63(4):1115–1127. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00210

Table 4.

Bayesian regression output broken down by model (Year 2 outcome and Year 1 predictors), informative prior distributions (priors and sources are listed) versus weakly informative prior distributions, and within-group follow-up regression.

Regression model B SD HPD interval Penalized deviance Bayes p value Prior
Source
TD SLI
Year 2 inhibition RT
Year 1 morphology
Informative 8,765 .504 300ms 400ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
   Intercept 459.480 30.753 399.149, 528.983
   Group 126.112 28.844 69.834, 181.687
   Morphology 6.886 3.286 0.571, 13.398
   Group × Morphology −8.280 3.667 −15.454,−1.226
   Age 5.462 3.409 −1.250, 11.953
Weakly informative 8,765 .501 0.001 0.001
   Intercept 129.127 31.131 66.528, 187.482
   Group 32.944 28.431 −23.607, 86.422
   Morphology 14.986 3.578 7.863, 21.779
   Group × Morphology 3.578 3.712 −3.265, 11.146
   Age 29.920 3.742 22.606, 37.093
Within-group SLI Informative 3,870 .500 400ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
   Intercept 456.254 30.754 399.888, 521.376
   Morphology 2.499 6.144 −9.081, 14.904
   Age 11.672 4.763 2.270, 20.891
Within-group TD Informative 4,872 .504 300ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
   Intercept 353.063 30.454 295.712, 414.010
   Morphology 13.608 3.464 7.141, 20.789
   Age 6.773 4.277 −2.097, 14.801
Year 1 vocabulary
Informative 8,374 .499 300ms 400ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
  Intercept 422.653 30.595 362.083, 481.899
  Group 119.542 30.775 59.664, 179.670
  Vocabulary 1.699 0.434 0.840, 2.542
  Group × Vocabulary −0.677 0.352 −1.367, 0.022
  Conners t score 1.701 0.437 0.832, 2.546
  Age −12.558 4.547 −21.751, −3.989
Weakly informative 8,785 .499 0.001 0.001
  Intercept 89.805 30.708 29.898, 149.884
  Group 17.712 30.764 −40.803, 79.515
  Vocabulary 2.928 0.459 2.003, 3.800
  Group × Vocabulary 0.408 0.358 −0.285, 1.112
  Conners t score 2.082 0.455 1.190, 2.973
  Age 3.983 4.749 −5.285, 13.241
Within-group SLI informative 3,857 .500 400ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
  Intercept 441.850 31.436 379.878, 502.911
  PPVT 0.162 0.992 −1.807, 2.085
  Conners t score 3.598 0.894 1.845, 5.353
  Age −11.294 7.183 −25.296, 2.898
Within-group TD informative 4,864 .500 300 ms Kail, 1994; McElree, 2001; Schul et al., 2004; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012
  Intercept 333.504 30.680 272.920, 393.641
  PPVT 2.198 0.423 1.365, 3.027
  Conners t score 0.862 0.479 −0.069, 1.817
  Age −6.822 5.502 −18.077, 3.662
Year 2 morphology
Year 1 inhibition RT
Informative 3,101 .501 11 7 Kaushanskaya et al., 2017; Norbury et al., 2016; Tomblin et al., 1997
   Intercept 10.321 0.330 9.668, 10.968
   Group −2.034 0.658 −3.326, −0.760
   Inhibition RT −0.002 0.001 −0.003, −0.000
   Group × Inhibition RT −0.003 0.008 −0.005, −0.001
Within-group SLI informative 1,166 .500 7 Kaushanskaya et al., 2017; Norbury et al., 2016; Tomblin et al., 1997
   Intercept 9.157 1.387 6.427, 11.917
   Inhibition RT −0.003 0.001 −0.004, −0.002
   Age 0.011 0.111 −0.207, 0.232
Within-group TD informative 1,875 .500 11 Kaushanskaya et al., 2017; Norbury et al., 2016; Tomblin et al., 1997
   Intercept 14.009 1.823 10.432, 17.649
   Inhibition RT −0.001 0.001 −0.002, 0.001
   Age −0.233 0.153 −0.538, 0.067

Note. All models included predictors that met our ≥ 90% posterior inclusion probability criterion in Bayesian model averaging analyses, and all priors had low precision (0.001) due to the novelty of analyses. HPD = highest posterior density; TD = typically developing; SLI = specific language impairment; RT = inhibition reaction time; Morphology = morphological comprehension measured by Test of Language Development: Intermediate–Fourth Edition Morphological Comprehension subscale (Hammill & Newcomer, 2008); Vocabulary = receptive vocabulary measured by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition (Dunn & Dunn, 2007); Conners t scores = ADHD Rating Scale (Conners et al., 2008).