Table 2.
Parallels between patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) development processes in the literature.
| Phases (review paper [23]) and steps (US Food and Drug Administration Guide [10]) | Stages (Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust [21,26]) | |
| Phase 1: Establish correct health outcomes to measure | ||
|
|
Step 1: Hypothesize conceptual framework | Stage I: Conceptual model for the PROM and its initial items are developed |
| Phase 2: Develop PROM items | ||
|
|
Step 2: Adjust conceptual framework and draft instrument | Stage I: Conceptual model for the PROM and its initial items are developed |
| Phase 3: Test the PROM items on comprehensibility and a range of psychometric criteria | ||
|
|
Step 3: Confirm conceptual framework and assess other measurement properties | Stage III: Psychometric field-testing of the PROM being developed |
|
|
Step 4: Collect, analyze, and interpret data | Stage III: Psychometric field-testing of the PROM being developed |
|
|
Step 5: Modify instrument | All stages: PROM item revision activities |
|
|
Iteration back to Step 1, with further testing | Stage II: Revised PROM items from Stage I are field-tested on a larger cohort of patients |