Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 29;33(6):397–404. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12578

TABLE 5.

Comparisons between HOPEa, LIFE21,b, MIREC22,c, and NC EPS23,d studies

HOPEa LIFE21b MIREC22,c NC EPS23,d
Women Men Women Men Women Women
Study design Prospective study Prospective study Retrospective study Prospective study
Urine collection Daily for two menstrual cycles Once at enrolment Once during first-trimester visit Three samples from each menstrual cycle
Study population 183 (170; BPA available) 183 (169; BPA available) 501 (454; BPA available) 501(439; BPA available) 2001 (1742; BPA available) 221 (221; BPA available)
Median Bisphenol A (BPA) Exposure (ng/ml) 3.01 2.94 Pregnant: 0.63
Not pregnant: 0.68
Pregnancy: 0.53
Not pregnant: 0.49
0.80 2.7
Age 27.3 28.5 30.0 31.8 32.8 29
Prior birth 42.4% 47.0% 48.0% 71.3% 51.6%
FOR estimates 1.07 (0.75–1.53) 1.02 (0.72, 1.47) 0.96 (0.83, 1.10) 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) 0.97 (0.83, 1.14) Not reported
Impact of increasing BPA on time to pregnancy (TTP) No association No association No association No association No association No association
a

The Home Observation of Peri-conceptional Exposures study.

b

The Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment.

c

The Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals.

d

The North Carolina Early Pregnancy Study.