Table 3.
ATT |
SE |
BI |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | λ | rst | λ | rst | λ | rst |
ATT1 | 0.86 | 0.86 | — | 0.34 | — | 0.71 |
ATT2 | 0.88 | 0.88 | — | 0.34 | — | 0.73 |
ATT3 | 0.92 | 0.92 | — | 0.36 | — | 0.76 |
ATT4 | 0.95 | 0.95 | — | 0.37 | — | 0.79 |
ATT5 | 0.93 | 0.93 | — | 0.36 | — | 0.77 |
ATT6 | 0.89 | 0.89 | — | 0.35 | — | 0.74 |
ATT7 | 0.85 | 0.85 | — | 0.33 | — | 0.70 |
ATT8 | 0.88 | 0.88 | — | 0.34 | — | 0.73 |
SE1 | — | 0.34 | 0.87 | 0.87 | — | 0.54 |
SE2 | — | 0.37 | 0.94 | 0.94 | — | 0.58 |
SE3 | — | 0.37 | 0.94 | 0.94 | — | 0.58 |
SE4 | — | 0.38 | 0.96 | 0.96 | — | 0.60 |
SE5 | — | 0.37 | 0.95 | 0.95 | — | 0.59 |
SE6 | — | 0.38 | 0.96 | 0.96 | — | 0.60 |
SE7 | — | 0.37 | 0.95 | 0.95 | — | 0.59 |
SE8 | — | 0.36 | 0.92 | 0.92 | — | 0.57 |
BI1 | — | 0.41 | — | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
BI2 | — | 0.42 | — | 0.61 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
BI3 | — | 0.42 | — | 0.61 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
BI4 | — | 0.42 | — | 0.60 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
BI5 | — | 0.42 | — | 0.61 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
BI6 | — | 0.42 | — | 0.60 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
BI7 | — | 0.41 | — | 0.60 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
BI8 | — | 0.41 | — | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
Correlations | ||||||
ATT with SE | 0.40 | |||||
ATT with BI | 0.43 | |||||
SE with BI | 0.62 | |||||
Reliability estimates (ω) | ||||||
ATT | 0.97 | |||||
SE | 0.98 | |||||
BI | 0.99 |
ATT, attitude; BI, behavioral intention; SE, self-efficacy; WLSMV, weighted least squares with mean and variance correction estimation used; λ, pattern coefficient; rst, structure coefficient; ω, coefficient omega reliability estimate.
Dashes represent pattern coefficients constrained to zero and not estimated in the model. Results were generated using single imputation for missing at random (MAR) data.