Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2019 Oct 18;126(1):94–108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315701

Table 3.

Correlates of fasting triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles. Spearman correlations were used to determine correlation coefficients (r) with Bonferroni corrections to account for 4 comparisons between TRLP subfractions and each variable.

Fasting TRLP
Correlation coefficient (r)
Large Medium Small Very Small
r P-value r P-value r P-value r P-value
All women
Insulin sensitivity index (n=107) −0.37 0.0007 −0.19 0.472 0.01 1.000 −0.201 0.379
Visceral fat (n=96) 0.56 0.0001 0.44 0.0001 0.16 1.000 0.42 0.0002
Liver fat (n=94) 0.50 0.0001 0.27 0.085 0.12 1.000 0.24 0.213
SCD-116 index (n=122) 0.33 0.002 0.40 0.0001 0.12 1.000 0.35 0.001
SCD-118 index (n=122) 0.23 0.117 0.34 0.002 0.05 1.000 0.31 0.005
Black women
Insulin sensitivity index (n=65) −0.47 0.001 −0.34 0.0495 −0.13 1.000 −0.38 0.016
Visceral fat (n=57) 0.57 0.0001 0.48 0.001 0.09 1.000 0.57 0.0001
Liver fat (n=54) 0.41 0.024 0.23 0.961 −0.03 1.000 0.39 0.039
SCD-116 index (n=73) 0.19 1.000 0.32 0.052 −0.02 1.000 0.30 0.088
SCD-118 index (n=73) 0.17 1.000 0.34 0.030 −0.13 1.000 0.31 0.069
White women
Insulin sensitivity index (n=42) −0.46 0.02 −0.20 1.000 −0.03 1.000 0.02 1.000
Visceral fat (n=39) 0.58 0.001 0.23 1.000 0.08 1.000 0.19 1.000
Liver fat (n=40) 0.60 0.0004 0.24 1.000 0.17 1.000 0.01 1.000
SCD-116 index (n=49) 0.41 0.033 0.32 0.252 0.14 1.000 0.34 0.157
SCD-118 index (n=49) 0.17 1.000 0.21 1.000 0.07 1.000 0.19 1.000