Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug 12;37(9):1013–1023. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0198-8

Table 1:

Comparison of using electrical, optical, and chemical manipulation and recording of neuronal activity.

Modality Spatial resolution Temporal resolution Sensitivity Selectivity
Electrical stimulation Limited by current spreading and electrode dimensions Sub-microsecond Highly tunable Limited ‒all cells surrounding probe experience field
Electrical recording <10 μm Sub-microsecond >10 μV Limited - pharmacology required to determine contributors to current
Optical stimulation Single cell optical stimulation144 Sub-microsecond Highly tunable by irradiation power, wavelength, etc. High; only light-sensitive reporters will respond
Optical recording Single cell145 Sub-microsecond; can record single action potentials Limited by available reporters High; selective biosensors for neurotransmitters and analytes have been developed
FSCV >100 μm limited by large devices required ≥100 ms Can detect electroactive molecules over large concentration range Moderate; care must be taken to validate electrochemical signatures of recording
Microdialysis >150 μm limited by large size of probes Seconds to minutes Sensitivity towards a large range of analytes High; defined by high- resolution chemical analytics89
Chemical stimulation Limited by diffusion Seconds to minutes; dictated by diffusion and metabolism Moderate; tunable through dose applied High; can be fine-tuned using synthetic chemistry
Chemical recording Single-cell109 Sub-microsecond110 Excellent; can be fine-tuned using synthetic chemistry High ‒ can be fine-tuned using synthetic chemistry