Table IV.
Dose delivered and dose received of the stress prevention initiatives in the HHS study
| Dose delivered (reported by students, teachers or school coordinators) |
Dose received (reported by students) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stress preventive initiatives | School level | Class level | Student levela |
| Curriculum | 39.7%a | 34/79 | 41% (SR: 10–62%, CR: 0–100%) |
| Stress lessons | |||
| High dose (4 lessons) | 3/14 | 11/79 | 13% (SR: 0–58%, CR: 0–71%0 |
| Medium dose (2–3 lessons) | 3/14 | 19/79 | 34% (SR: 12–71%, CR: 0–100%) |
| Low dose (0–1 lessons) | 8/14 | 49/79 | 53% (SR: 2–88%, CR: 0–100%) |
| Number of lessons, mean (SD) | 1.4 (1.8) (0–4) | 1.4 (1.5) (0–4) | 1.5 (1.0) (SR: 0.5–3.4, CR: 0.2–3.5) |
| Time management initiativeb | — | 26/79 | 27% (SR: 0–68%, CR: 0–83%) |
| Time management course | 13/15 | 31/79 | 44% (SR: 19–72%, CR: 0–87%) |
| Time management exercise | — | 46/79 | 49% (SR: 0–95%, CR: 0–100%) |
| Stress policy | |||
| Had a stress policy at first follow-up | 7/15 | — | — |
| Developed a stress policy during the school year 2016–17 | 2/15 | — | — |
| Half-yearly counselling sessions | 7/15 | 31/79 | 43% (SR: 16–80%, CR: 0–100%) |
| Annual coursework planc | 8/15 | 1/79 | 2% (SR: 0–7%, CR: 0–50%) |
| Dates for hand out | 12/15 | 2/79 | 10% (SR: 3–27%, CR: 0–60%) |
| Assignment due dates and time | 13/15 | 12/79 | 35% (SR: 19–51%, CR: 0.0–100%) |
| Time use for assignments | 9/15 | 1/79 | 9% (SR: 0–24%, CR: 0–50%) |
a
Expressed as mean percentage; calculated as the sum of the percentage of students/teachers at each school divided by the number of schools. SR, school range; CR, class range.
b
Have implemented the time management course and the exercise.
c
Have implemented all elements of the annual coursework plan.