TABLE 1.
The autonomy treatment and SCL increase individual and team productivity when intrinsic motivation is included as a control.
| (1) | (2) | (4) | (3) | |
| Variables | Individual productivity | Group productivity | Individual productivity | Group productivity |
| SCL | 31.09** | 57.69* | 31.77* | 44.26 |
| (13.08) | (28.40) | (13.87) | (29.38) | |
| Autonomy prime | 3.943* | 11.48* | 3.629 | 10.91* |
| (2.283) | (4.959) | (2.386) | (5.056) | |
| Intrinsic motivation | 0.899** | −0.0229 | 0.941** | −0.0379 |
| (0.262) | (0.568) | (0.273) | (0.579) | |
| Closeness | −0.00563 | 0.479 | ||
| (0.626) | (1.326) | |||
| Constant | 28.16** | 158.9** | 27.94** | 160.1** |
| (4.002) | (8.691) | (4.526) | (9.591) | |
| Observations | 88 | 88 | 85 | 85 |
| F-statistic | 5.83 | 2.62 | 4.34 | 1.43 |
| p-value | 0.001 | 0.056 | 0.003 | 0.23 |
| R-squared | 0.172 | 0.086 | 0.178 | 0.067 |
With both intrinsic motivation and closeness as controls, SCL increases individual but not group productivity while the treatment only affects group productivity. Standard errors in parentheses. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 one-tailed t-tests.