Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 May 8;26(4):1630–1640. doi: 10.1177/0962280217708664

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Coverage of 95% two-sided confidence intervals for the impact of treating the optimal subgroup versus the average confidence interval width (standardized so that the maximum width in a given sample size-data generating distribution pair is 1). The stabilized one-step confidence intervals have nominal coverage for all null distributions, and have coverage approaching nominal for all alternative distributions. The non-oracle CV-TMLE achieves near nominal coverage for all alternative distributions, though it has below nominal coverage of approximately 90% for all of the null distributions.