Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;40(21):4230–4239. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2397-19.2020

Table 1.

Shown are the mean ± SEM of M1 coil intensities (columns 1 and 2) and MEP latencies (columns 3 and 4) for each current direction, as well as the cerebellar coil intensities (column 5) used across each experiment

PA intensity
(% MSO)
AP intensity
(% MSO)
PA latency AP latency Cerebellar intensity
(% MSO)
Experiment 1 43.41 ± 2.57 58.91 ± 3.02 21.02 ± 0.34 22.86 ± 0.41 68.33 ± 0.90
Experiment 2 46.29 ± 2.27 60.21 ± 3.35 21.37 ± 0.29 22.44 ± 0.33 67.14 ± 1.23
Experiment 3: Sequence 45.33 ± 2.73 60.82 ± 3.08 21.83 ± 0.38 22.92 ± 0.40 67.92 ± 0.92
Experiment 3: skill (As above) (As above) 22.04 ± 0.43 23.48 ± 0.49 (As above)