Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;6(21):eaba6357. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba6357

Fig. 4Comprehensive assessment for the effects of different interventions on endometrial regeneration and remodeling.

Fig. 4Comprehensive assessment for the effects of different interventions on endometrial regeneration and remodeling.

(A) Comparisons of endometrial gland numbers per unit area. (B) Comparisons of ratios of fibrotic area (%). (C) Comparisons of endometrial thickness (mm). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, all versus pre-D&C; #′#′#′P < 0.001 versus pre-D&C; #″P < 0.05, #″#″P < 0.01, and #″#″#″P < 0.001, all versus 2 months post-D&C; ##P < 0.01 versus 2 months post–HA-GEL, and the results shown are the mean ± SEM of three technical replicates from each animal.