Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;25(5):370–387. doi: 10.1007/s10495-020-01607-3

Table 1.

Analysis of drug combination effects

Citarinostat (µm) Momelotinib (µM) CI (CI 95%)
WSU-NHL
2 0.5 0.30 (0.06–1.39)
4 1 0.45 (0.06–2.77)
RL
2 0.5 0.14 (0.03–0.28)
4 1 0.13 (0.02–0.91)
KARPAS422
2 0.5 0.34 (0.23–0.49)
4 1 0.13 (0.17–0.42)
MEC1
2 0.5 0.35 (0.28–0.43)
4 1 0.16 (0.12–0.22)
GRANTA519
2 0.5 1.21 (0.15–1.66)
4 1 1.76 (0.35–3.93)
JEKO1
2 0.5 0.09 (0.02–0.36)
4 1 0.09 (0.02–0.55)
HUT78
2 0.5 0.19 (0.04–0.89)
4 1 0.16 (0.02–1.68)
KARPAS299
2 0.5 0.98 (0.16–1.71)
4 1 0.52 (0.14–2.52)
L1236
2 0.5 1.21 (0.36–4.04)
4 1 1.17 (0.37–3.73)
L540
2 0.5 0.57 (0.27–1.22)
4 1 0.05 ( 0 − 0.74)
RPMI8226
2 0.5 0.16 (0.04–0.63)
4 1 0.02 (0.01–0.34)
U266
2 0.5 0.18 (0.08–0.40)
4 1 0.17 (0.04–0.80)

Combination Index (CI) of citarinostat (2, 4 µM) in combination with momelotinib (0.5, 1 µM) after 24 h of treatment. Synergism, additivity, or antagonism were quantified by determining the CI calculated by the Chou–Talalay equation. Combination index (CI) CI < 1, synergism; CI = 1, additive effect; CI > 1, antagonism