Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 28;10(9):3868–3880. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6015

Table 3.

Results of multiple comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) between mortality at 3 dpi of the naturally Wolbachia‐uninfected populations (a) AlRo, and (b) DEF, and for the naturally Wolbachia‐infected populations (c) AMP, and (d) TOM sprayed or not with fungi (BB: Beauveria bassiana; MB: Metarhizium brunneum; Control: Tween 20 only) and treated or not with antibiotics (rif: rifampicin‐treated; nt: untreated)

(a) Naturally Wolbachia‐uninfected population AlRo
Treatments compared Estimate Std. Error z value p‐value
Control_rif versus Control_nt 0.327 0.236 1.387 1.000
BB_rif versus BB_nt −0.012 0.247 −0.049 1.000
MB_ rif versus MB_nt 0.085 0.175 0.489 1.000
BB_ nt versus Control_nt 1.684 0.196 8.607 <2e−16a
MB_nt versus Control_nt 1.818 0.194 9.386 <2e−16a
MB_ nt versus BB_nt 0.134 0.232 0.579 1.000
BB_ rif versus Control_rif 1.345 0.291 4.614 3.55E−05a
MB_rif versus Control_rif 1.576 0.276 5.702 1.06E−07a
MB_ rif versus BB_rif 0.232 0.202 1.145 1.000
(b) Naturally Wolbachia‐uninfected population DEF
Treatments compared Estimate Std. Error z value p‐value
Control_rif versus Control_nt 0.177 0.328 0.539 1.000
BB_rif versus BB_nt 0.089 0.368 0.241 1.000
MB_ rif versus MB_nt −0.020 0.258 −0.077 1.000
BB_ nt versus Control_nt 1.255 0.277 4.525 5.44E‐05a
MB_nt versus Control_nt 1.738 0.265 6.550 5.17E‐10a
MB_ nt versus BB_nt 0.482 0.339 1.423 1.000
BB_ rif versus Control_rif 1.167 0.416 2.806 .045a
MB_rif versus Control_rif 1.541 0.393 3.925 .001a
MB_ rif versus BB_rif 0.374 0.304 1.231 1.000
(c) Naturally Wolbachia‐infected population AMP
Treatments compared Estimate Std. Error z value p‐value
Control_rif versus Control_nt −0.644 0.270 −2.390 .152
BB_rif versus BB_nt 0.013 0.235 0.056 1.000
MB_ rif versus MB_nt 0.070 0.170 0.411 1.000
BB_ nt versus Control_nt 1.322 0.178 7.424 1.03E‐12a
MB_nt versus Control_nt 1.579 0.174 9.088 < 2e‐16a
MB_ nt versus BB_nt 0.257 0.219 1.175 1.000
BB_ rif versus Control_rif 1.979 0.316 6.258 3.50E‐09a
MB_rif versus Control_rif 2.293 0.305 7.529 4.58E‐13a
MB_ rif versus BB_rif 0.314 0.195 1.608 .970
(d) Naturally Wolbachia‐infected population TOM
Treatments compared Estimate Std. Error z value p‐value
Control_rif versus Control_nt 0.125 0.177 0.706 1.000
BB_rif versus BB_nt −0.637 0.234 −2.717 .059.
MB_ rif versus MB_nt −0.012 0.175 −0.069 1.000
BB_ nt versus Control_nt 0.949 0.152 6.239 3.96E‐09a
MB_nt versus Control_nt 1.024 0.151 6.798 9.56E‐11a
MB_ nt versus BB_nt 0.075 0.200 0.374 1.000
BB_ rif versus Control_rif 0.187 0.250 0.751 1.000
MB_rif versus Control_rif 0.887 0.220 4.033 4.95E‐04a
MB_ rif versus BB_rif 0.699 0.205 3.414 .006a
a

* p‐value < .05,

** p‐value < .01,

*** p‐value < .001.