Table A8.

Summary of genital chemical bouquet analysis of all species using the ManyGLM approach including all significant explanatory variables

Parameter	Residual DF	DF	Deviance	p‐value	Compounds
Species	268	6	27,587	.001	Unknown terpene ester RI = 2,494*, unknown terpene ester RI = 2,139, henicosane, unknown pentyl ester RI = 2033, unknown terpene ester 2,435, unknown aromatic RI = 1,299, unknown terpene RI = 2,755, benzyl cyanide, unknown sesterterpene hydrocarbon RI = 2,370, (E)‐β‐ocimene*
Region	265	3	8,965	.001	Unknown RI = 2,840, 7,8‐dihydro‐β‐ionone, benzyl cyanide, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,511, 2‐phenylethyl dodecanoate, unknown triterpene RI = 2,891, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,718, hexadecane, unknown RI = 1,076, 3‐undecanone
(Region/Locality)	257	11	6,431	.016	(Z)‐β‐Ocimene, unknown RI = 1915, unknown hydrocarbon RI = 1,750, 18‐octadecanolide, henicosene (2068), 19‐methylicosyl acetate, napthalene, hexadecanoic acid, 3‐undecanone, unknown terpene ester RI = 2,310

The ten compounds that contribute the most to the deviance explained by a variable are listed for each variable. Compounds highlighted with * were also identified by an indicator analysis.