Table A12.
Summary of genital chemical bouquet analysis of H. erato using the ManyGLM approach including all significant explanatory variables
| Parameter | Residual DF | DF | Deviance | p‐val | Compounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | 88 | 3 | 6,142 | 0.001 | 3‐Undecanone, unknown sesterterpene RI = 2,636*, unknown RI = 2,840, unknown triterpene RI = 2,891*, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,511*, 2‐phenylethyl dodecanoate*, unknown RI = 2,451, unknown terpene ester RI = 2,435, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,718*, benzyl cyanide, |
| (Region/Locality) | 82 | 9 | 2,721 | 0.001 | Napthalene*, hexadecanoic acid, unknown diterpene RI = 2,205, unknown ester hexanoate RI = 1565, 18‐octadecanolide, unknown RI = 2,279, unknown macrolide RI = 1714, unknown RI = 1,424, unknown amide RI = 2,157, icosanal |
The ten compounds that contribute the most to the deviance explained by a variable are listed for each variable. Compounds highlighted with * were also identified by an indicator analysis.