Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;10(9):3895–3918. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6079

Table A12.

Summary of genital chemical bouquet analysis of H. erato using the ManyGLM approach including all significant explanatory variables

Parameter Residual DF DF Deviance p‐val Compounds
Region 88 3 6,142 0.001 3‐Undecanone, unknown sesterterpene RI = 2,636*, unknown RI = 2,840, unknown triterpene RI = 2,891*, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,511*, 2‐phenylethyl dodecanoate*, unknown RI = 2,451, unknown terpene ester RI = 2,435, unknown aromatic ester RI = 2,718*, benzyl cyanide,
(Region/Locality) 82 9 2,721 0.001 Napthalene*, hexadecanoic acid, unknown diterpene RI = 2,205, unknown ester hexanoate RI = 1565, 18‐octadecanolide, unknown RI = 2,279, unknown macrolide RI = 1714, unknown RI = 1,424, unknown amide RI = 2,157, icosanal

The ten compounds that contribute the most to the deviance explained by a variable are listed for each variable. Compounds highlighted with * were also identified by an indicator analysis.