Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;12(2):121–126.

Table 8.

Antimicrobial activity of investigated nanoclay based nanocomposites

Microorganisms Samples of nanoclay based nanocomposites (wt%)

1N:1C 1N:3C 1N:5C 3N:1C 3N:3C 3N:5C 5N:1C 5N:3C 5N:5C

Inhibition zone diameter (mm)
E. coli 28 ± 0.67f 32 ± 0.67e 25 ± 0.67l 29 ± 0.67h 27 ± 0.67j 24 ± 0.67m 24 ± 0.67m 22 ± 0.67n 20 ± 0.67p
S. enterica 38 ± 0.67a 38 ± 0.67a 32 ± 0.67e 36 ± 0.67c 37 ± 0.67b 29 ± 0.67h 28 ± 0.67i 24 ± 0.67m 21 ± 0.67o
S. aureus 30 ± 0.67g 35 ± 0.67d 24 ± 0.6m 28 ± 0.67i 31 ± 0.67f 25 ± 0.67l 26 ± 0.67k 21 ± 0.67o 19 ± 0.67q
A. brasiliensis 14 ± 0.67t 16 ± 0.67r 13 ± 0.67u 11 ± 0.6w 13 ± 0.67u 12 ± 0.67v 12 ± 0.67v 11 ± 0.67w 0 ± 0.67z
S. cerevisiae 14 ± 0.67t 15 ± 0.67s 12 ± 0.67v 12 ± 0.67v 12 ± 0.67v 11 ± 0.6w 11 ± 0.67w 11 ± 0.67w 11 ± 0.6w

The results were reported as mean ± SD. The different letters in each column indicate significant differences.

C: Chitosan

N: Nanoclay