. 2020 Apr;12(2):148–155.

Table 1.

The effect of L. casei WB 315 and CFO on feed intake, feed conversion ratio, fed efficiency

Treatment	Feed intake (g/chick/day) ± SD	Feed conversion ratio ± SD	Feed efficiency (%) ± SD
P0: 0% L. casei + 0% CFO	86.51^c ± 0.78	2.12^b ± 0.06	47.06^a ± 1.18
P1: 0.5% L. casei + 0% CFO	81.24^b ± 0.64	1.99^a ± 0.05	50.27^b ± 1.29
P2: 0% L. casei + 1% CFO	79.50^a ± 1.49	1.94^a ± 0.13	51.64^b ± 3.46
P3: 0.5% L. casei +1% CFO	79.31^a ± 1.01	1.98^a ± 0.06	50.54^b ± 1.45

^{(a, b, c)}

Means in the same column with the different superscript are significantly different (p<0.05).