Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;12(2):170–176.

Table 1.

The antifungal susceptibility pattern of Aspergillus flavus isolates

Aspergillus flavus Antifungal Minimum inhibitory concentration (μg/mL) R (%) %ECVa

MIC MIC50/ MIC90/ MICGM
Clinical isolates (20) LUL 0.00049–0.00781 0.00195 0.00391 0.00244 ND ND
AMB 16–64 32 64 44 20 (100) 0.0%
CASb 0.0625–4 0.25 2 0.24 10 (50) 50%
VRC 0.0625–1 0.125 0.5 0.76 0 (0.0) 100%
Environmental isolates (18) LUL 0.00195–0.00781 0.00391 0.00391 0.00336 ND ND
AMB 8–32 32 32 24.4 18 (100) 0.0%
CASb 0.0625–4 0.25 4 0.44 5 (27.8) 72.2%
VRC 0.125–2 0.5 1 0.5 0 (0.0) 100%
All isolates (38) LUL 0.00049–0.00781 0.00195 0.00391 0.00288 ND ND
AMB 8–64 32 64 33.8 38 (100) 0.0%
CAS b 0.0625–4 0.25 1 0.55 15 (39.5) 60.5%
VRC 0.0625–2 0.25 0.5 0.34 0 (0.0) 100%

LUL, Luliconazole; AMB, Amphotericin B; CAS, Caspofungin; VRC, Voriconazole; GM, Geometric mean; R, Resistance; ND, not determined (no ECVs were available).

a

%MICs less than or equal to than the epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) (ECV = 4 μg/ml for amphotericin B, 2 μg/ml for voriconazole, 0.5 μg/ml for caspofungin.

b

Minimum effective concentration (MEC), MEC50, MEC90 and MECGM were calculated for Aspergillus flavus.