Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 22;76(2):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.08.006

Table 1.

Comparison of growth kinetics between DP-MSCs and BMSCs.

Cell growth assay
Observation DP-MSC
BMSC
Repeated measure ANOVA—general linear model (GLM)
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Source F
Day 1 10,666.67 500.00 10,000.00 0.00 Corrected model 838.48**
Day 2 14,500.00 750.00 11,333.33 1000.00 Intercept 39,800**
Day 3 24,000.00 866.03 17,333.33 4000.00 Group 640.12**
Day 4 32,000.00 866.03 23,333.33 2645.75 Days 1674**
Day 5 44,333.33 1000.00 33,333.33 4000.00 Group × days 27.34**
Day 6 68,166.67 1750.00 55,000.00 1887.46
Day 7 80,000.00 3968.63 60,000.00 3774.92
Day 8 82,166.67 3682.73 63,333.33 3307.19
Day 9 82,500.00 4520.79 66,000.00 3464.10
Population doubling time and clonogenic assay
Parameter DP-MSCs
BMSCs
t value
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
Doubling time (h) 31.11 2.22 51.83 0.45 18.680**
Clonogenic assay (no of colonies) 50.00 2.01 24.00 1.00 26.00**

**P < 0.001.

ANOVA, analysis of variance; DP-MSCs, dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells; SD, standard deviation.