Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;35(4):347–357. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz084

Table 3.

Correlations between the mCWIT, in-lab Stroop, and neuropsychological global and domain performance, including correlations of early and late mCWIT trials with cognitive domains

Laboratory-based neuropsychological performancea A
In-lab Stroop Color-Word Inhibition Trial (raw)c
B
mCWIT Timeb
C
mCWIT # errors
D
mCWIT time Days 1–7
E
mCWIT time Days 8–14
F
mCWIT errors Days 1–3
G
mCWIT errors Days 4–14
Global performance 0.76d** −0.59** −0.42** −0.58** −0.53** −0.23* −0.47**
Language 0.56** −0.34** −0.34** −0.33** −0.31** −0.22* −0.34**
Executive functions 0.76e** −0.55** −0.22* −0.55** −0.47** −0.11 −0.31**
Processing speed 0.59** −0.49** −0.38** −0.49** −0.43** −0.20 −0.44**
Learning 0.54** −0.36** −0.36** −0.36** −0.31** −0.20 −0.36**
Recall 0.49** −0.47** −0.36** −0.48** −0.40** −0.25* −0.35**
Working memory 0.60** −0.53** −0.30** −0.50** −0.48** −0.09 −0.41**
Complex motor skills 0.45** −0.41** −0.23* −0.38** −0.41** −0.14 −0.27*
In-lab Stroop Color-Word Inhibition Trial (raw) −0.63** −0.26* −0.62** −0.58** −0.10 −0.35**

mCWIT = mobile color-word interference test

Columns B & C: Average mCWIT performance over all trials; Columns D & E: early and late trials of mCWIT time; Columns F & G: early and late trials of mCWIT errors

aUncorrected scaled scores; bhigher scores = slower (worse) performance; chigher scores = faster (better) performance; dtest included in Global Performance score; etest included in Executive Functions domain score

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01