Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;7(5):e16342. doi: 10.2196/16342

Table 2.

Summary of training evaluation responses.

Training evaluation questions TEQa respondents (n=99) Training dropouts (n=49) Training completers (n=50) F value (df1,df2)b or chi-square value (df)c P value
Training evaluation for CBMd as a whole

1. What do you think of the quality of this CBM training?e, n (%) 47 (47.5) 15 (30.6) 32 (64.0) 11.1 (1)c .001

2. How satisfied are you overall with this CBM training?f, n (%) 47 (47.5) 16 (32.7) 31 (62.0) 8.6 (1)c .003

3. I think the CBM training helped me with my problemsg, mean (SD) 3.43 (1.99) 2.73 (1.63) 4.12 (2.08) 13.60 (1,97)b <.001

4. Would you recommend this CBM training to others?h, n (%) 48 (48.5) 16 (32.7) 32 (64.0) 9.7 (1)c .002

5. Will you use the CBM training in the further?h, n (%) 65 (65.7) 23 (46.9) 42 (84.0) 15.1 (1)c <.001
Training evaluation for AtBMi

1. The goal of the AtBM training was clear before I started itg, mean (SD) 4.98 (1.84) 4.69 (2.06) 5.26 (1.56) 2.37 (1,97)b .13

2. The instructions on what I should do during the AtBM training was clearg, mean (SD) 6.05 (1.55) 5.73 (1.80) 6.36 (1.21) 4.13 (1,97)b .045

3. The AtBM training was difficult to dog, mean (SD) 3.25 (1.83) 3.53 (1.89) 2.98 (1.74) 2.27 (1,97)b .14

4. The AtBM training was fun to dog, mean (SD) 3.29 (1.93) 2.61 (1.74) 3.96 (1.88) 13.65 (1,97)b <.001
Training evaluation for ApBMj

1. The goal of the ApBM training was clear before I started itg, mean (SD) 5.11 (1.88) 4.80 (2.04) 5.42 (1.67) 2.78 (1,97)b .10

2. The instructions on what I should do during the ApBM training was clearg, mean (SD) 5.98 (1.48) 5.65 (1.79) 6.30 (1.02) 4.94 (1,97)b .03

3. The ApBM training was difficult to dog, mean (SD) 2.89 (1.80) 3.18 (1.83) 2.60 (1.73) 2.66 (1,97)b .11

4. The ApBM training was fun to dog, mean (SD) 3.81 (2.07) 3.02 (1.96) 4.58 (1.89) 16.26 (1,97)b <.001

aTEQ: training evaluation question.

bOne-way analyses of variance were conducted to test the differences in modal responses of the training evaluation between training dropouts and training completers.

cChi-square tests were conducted to test the differences in average responses of the training evaluation between training dropouts and training completers.

dCBM: cognitive bias modification.

ePoor, fair, good, excellent; percentage of “good” and “excellent” responses.

fVery dissatisfied, fairly dissatisfied, fairly satisfied, very satisfied; percentage of “fairly satisfied” and “very satisfied” responses.

gParticipants indicated the extent to which they agreed with this statement on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree).

hNo, definitely not; No, I do not think so; Yes, I think so; Yes, definitely; percentage of “Yes, I think so” and “Yes, definitely” responses.

iAtBM: attentional bias modification.

jApBM: approach bias modification.