Table 2. Isolation by distance and resistance.
Mantel partial test of the effect of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by resistance (IBR) from climate and vegetation surfaces on the genetic differentiation of Humboldtiana durangoensis populations for the three temporal frames used in this study.
| Resistance model | Comparison | LGM | Mid Holocene | Current | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p | R | p | R | p | ||
| Climate | fst vs. resistance | 0.474 | 0.094 | 0.368 | 0.122 | 0.418 | 0.111 |
| fst vs. geogra|resistance | 0.182 | 0.321 | 0.39 | 0.081 | 0.295 | 0.191 | |
| fst vs. resistance|geogra | 0.105 | 0.398 | −0.181 | 0.362 | −0.074 | 0.476 | |
| Vegetation | fst vs. resistance | 0.057 | 0.382 | −0.144 | 0.29 | −0.111 | 0.344 |
| fst vs. geogra|resistance | 0.782 | 0.005 | 0.796 | 0.003 | 0.784 | 0.009 | |
| fst vs. resistance|geogra | −0.699 | 0.012 | −0.725 | 0.013 | −0.706 | 0.021 | |
Notes:
R, Spearman correlation coefficient between pairwise genetic distances (FST/(1−FST)) and the Euclidean distance from the geography and pairwise resistance of CIRCUITSCAPE. p, Statistical significance obtained from 1,000 replicates.
Bold indicates comparisons that were signifcant with p < 0.05.