Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;8:e9177. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9177

Table 2. Isolation by distance and resistance.

Mantel partial test of the effect of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by resistance (IBR) from climate and vegetation surfaces on the genetic differentiation of Humboldtiana durangoensis populations for the three temporal frames used in this study.

Resistance model Comparison LGM Mid Holocene Current
R p R p R p
Climate fst vs. resistance 0.474 0.094 0.368 0.122 0.418 0.111
fst vs. geogra|resistance 0.182 0.321 0.39 0.081 0.295 0.191
fst vs. resistance|geogra 0.105 0.398 −0.181 0.362 −0.074 0.476
Vegetation fst vs. resistance 0.057 0.382 −0.144 0.29 −0.111 0.344
fst vs. geogra|resistance 0.782 0.005 0.796 0.003 0.784 0.009
fst vs. resistance|geogra −0.699 0.012 −0.725 0.013 −0.706 0.021

Notes:

R, Spearman correlation coefficient between pairwise genetic distances (FST/(1−FST)) and the Euclidean distance from the geography and pairwise resistance of CIRCUITSCAPE. p, Statistical significance obtained from 1,000 replicates.

Bold indicates comparisons that were signifcant with p < 0.05.