Table 7.
Agreement of the three criteria
| Criteria | Male (n=37 500) | Female (n=27 402) | Total (n=64 902) | |||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| CDS 2013 vs IDF 2005 | ||||||
| (+) (+) | 9093 | 24.2 | 1800 | 6.6 | 10 893 | 16.8 |
| (+) (−) | 2201 | 5.9 | 266 | 1.0 | 2467 | 3.8 |
| (−) (+) | 2215 | 5.9 | 3657 | 13.3 | 5872 | 9.0 |
| (−) (−) | 23 991 | 64.0 | 21 679 | 79.1 | 45 670 | 70.4 |
| Kappa value, 95% CI | 0.720* (0.712 to 0.728) | 0.414* (0.400 to 0.428) | 0.641* (0.633 to 0.649) | |||
| CDS 2013 vs harmonising criteria 2009 | ||||||
| (+) (+) | 10 968 | 29.2 | 2066 | 7.5 | 13 034 | 20.1 |
| (+) (−) | 326 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 326 | 0.5 |
| (−) (+) | 6860 | 18.3 | 4749 | 17.3 | 11 609 | 17.9 |
| (−) (−) | 19 346 | 51.6 | 20 587 | 75.1 | 39 933 | 61.5 |
| Kappa value, 95% CI | 0.609* (0.601 to 0.617) | 0.395* (0.383 to 0.407) | 0.572* (0.566 to 0.578) | |||
| IDF 2005 vs harmonising criteria 2009 | ||||||
| (+) (+) | 11 061 | 29.5 | 5457 | 19.9 | 16 518 | 25.5 |
| (+) (−) | 247 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 247 | 0.4 |
| (−) (+) | 6767 | 18.0 | 1358 | 5.0 | 8125 | 12.5 |
| (−) (−) | 19 425 | 51.8 | 20 587 | 75.1 | 40 012 | 61.6 |
| Kappa value, 95% CI | 0.618* (0.610 to 0.626) | 0.858* (0.850 to 0.866) | 0.708* (0.702 to 0.714) | |||
The differences between every two criteria were evaluated by χ2 test. ‘+’ means that patient was diagnosed as metabolic syndrome by the given criteria; ‘−’ means that patient was no metabolic syndrome by the given criteria.
*P value＜0.001.
CDS, China Diabetes Society; IDF, International Diabetes Federation.