Skip to main content
. 2020 May 16;98(5):skaa161. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa161

Table 1.

Effect of the prenatal and postnatal (growing) climatic environment on the growth performance of growing pigs1

Items GTN–PTN GTN–PHS GHS–PTN GHS–PHS RSD2 Statistics3
Live BW, kg
 75 d 35.8 36.1 36.6 35.2 1.7 GE**, P**, S* PE × GET, GE × P**
 82 d 42.3 42.6 43.7 41.6 1.69
 140 d 104.4a 105.8a 98.8b 95.6b
ADG, g · d−1
 75 to 81 d 859 888 997 943 70 P**, GE × P**
 82 to 140 d 1,147 1,114 1,017 989
 82 to 140 d4 1,110a 1,129a 983b 967b 52 GE**
ADFI, g · d−1
 75 to 81 d 1,729 1,884 1,996 1,901 168 P**, GE × P**
 82 to 140 d 2,635 2,683 2,347 2,307
 82 to 140 d4 2,602a 2,680a 2,215b 2,255b 84 GE**, S*
ADFI per metabolic BW, g · kg–0.60·d–1
 75 to 81 d 198 208 218 210 11 P**, GE × P*
 82 to 140 d 196 202 180 181
 82 to 140 d4 198a 202a 172b 178b 6 PET, GE**, S*
FCR
 75 to 81 d 2.02 2.12 2.01 2.02 0.09 P**
 82 to 140 d 2.30 2.41 2.31 2.33
 82 to 140 d4 2.34 2.37 2.29 2.31 0.08 ns

1A total of 48 female pigs (housed three pigs per pen) were distributed to a 2 x 2 factorial design based on their prenatal environment (PE) and their postnatal growing environment (GE): TN – thermoneutral (18 to 24˚C), HS = heat-stressed (28 to 34˚C). First main period: Pigs were maintained in TN conditions from 75 to 81 d of age. Second main period: The GTN room was maintained in TN conditions until 140 d of age; in GHS room, temperature transition started at 82 d of age and full-blown thermal challenge was from 84 to 140 d of age.

2Residual standard deviation.

3The pen was considered as the experimental unit. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED model with PE, GE, period (P), their interactions, and sire (S) as fixed effects. LS means with different superscript letters differ according to the experimental group TP < 0.10, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

4Adjusted performance based on the average value measured during first main period (944 g/d, 1,915g/d, 212 g·kg BW−0.60·d−1, and 2.03 for ADG, ADFI, ADFI per metabolic BW, and FCR, respectively).