Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Chem Biol. 2020 Feb 13;27(5):511–524.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.01.011

Table 1.

IC50 values for RuR and Ru360

Inhibitor Construct EC50 (μM) n
RuR K2P2.1 (TREK-1) K2p2.1 (TREK-1) >100 3
K2p2.1 I110D 0.287 ± 0.054 3
K2p2.1 I110E 13.6 ± 2.7 3
K2p2.1 I110K >100
K2p2.1 I110D/G137I 0.154 ± 0.023 3
K2p2.1 I110D + 50 μM
ML335
0.173 ± 0.021 3
K2p2.1 N147D 47.7 ± 6.3** 2
K2p2.1 N147E 0.0733 ± 0.0165 3
K2p2.1 I110D/N147D 0.0127 ± 0.0023 3
K2p2.1 I110D/N147E 0.0126 ± 0.0034 3
Other K2Ps K2p10.1 (TREK-2) [D135]* 0.23 ± 0.06 μM (Braun et al., 2015)
K2p9.1 (TASK-3) [E70]* 0.114 ± 0.021 μM 3
Ru360 K2P2.1 (TREK-1) K2p2.1 (TREK-1) >100 3
K2p2.1 I110D 11.3 ± 1.8 3
Other K2Ps K2p10.1 (TREK-2) [D135]* 2.8 ± 1.2 3
K2p9.1 (TASK-3) [E70]* 15.6 ± 2.7 3

n number of oocytes

Errors are SEM.

‘*’

residue at the K2P2.1 (TREK-1) I110D equivalent position

**

Lower bound constrained to 0.2