Table 1.
Factors Associated with Poor Outcomes for SNF Patients with HF | Problem Specifics | Barriers to Quality Improvement | Targets for Intervention | Recommendations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patients | • Older • Multiple co-morbidities, • Functional and cognitive impairment |
• Administrative pressure for timely hospital discharge • Lack of attention to patient goals of care and end of life preferences • Lack of evidence based treatment strategies |
• Improved evaluation of readiness for hospital discharge • Patient centered care; Attention to geriatric and cardiology care issues • Underutilization of palliative care |
• Coordinated multidisciplinary pre-discharge assessments • Investigation into geriatric based management options, consultation with cardiologist • Consultation to palliative care and hospice services |
Transitions of Care | • Documentation deficits | • Lack of standardization • Unclear which components of care are most pertinent to SNF admission • Lack of HF specific information |
• Identification of pertinent HF specific information • Standardization of discharge documentation • Addressing patient goals of care • Addressing social support structure |
• Inclusion of physiologic targets, and changes and responses to medication regimen • Recommending laboratory monitoring, and weight management • Inclusion of advanced directives, health literacy • Designation of primary caregiver/decision maker • Required discharge summary from SNF providers to community providers • Document functional gains and NYHA class, HF symptoms at SNF discharge • Provision of HF specific discharge information to cardiologist/HF specialist |
• Communication deficits | • High clinical complexity • Inadequate HF training among SNF staff • Time constraints and volume of transfers limit participation in hand-offs • Lack of designated community PCP • Inability for frail cognitively impaired patients to participate in their own care. |
• Inter-professional team communication of HF details • Establish designated communications personnel • Enhance mid-level or physician to physician hand-offs |
• Include HF specific information in multidisciplinary transitional communications • Develop Inter-professional care plan • Designate select staff to communicate comprehensive discharge instructions role to select staff • Utilize a transitional coach for patients • Enhance caregiver involvement |
|
• Transitional Care Coordination |
• Lack of SNF staff organizational structures • Lack of staff training in transitional care |
• Develop of HF sensitive transitional care programs | • Incorporate HF specific clinical targets and patient goals into communications • Involving HF specialty provider in communication chain |
|
Systems of Care | • Risk Prediction | • Lack of validated HF risk prediction models for SNF patients | • Develop and validate current risk prediction models for patients with HF in SNFs | • Include caregivers in HF transitional care • Use of one or all currently available risk prediction tools to guide general risk estimates until more specific risk models are available: -HOSPITAL score45 – identifies risk of potentially avoidable 30-day readmissions in SNF patients, but not specific for HF patients -Registry based risk prediction tool44 – identifies indicators of HF rehospitalization in one SNF, but not validated -CORE risk calculator43 -predicts readmission risk of hospitalized HF patients, but not validated in SNF cohort |
• Disease Management Programs |
• Lack of standardized protocols • Culture of SNF care not aligned with goals of post-acute patients with HF • Lack of outcomes data proving benefit of HF DMPs in SNFs |
• Staff education to improve recognition and monitoring of at-risk patients • Development of DMPs tailored to SNF patient demographic • Further research and outcomes data on effects of SNF based HF DMPs |
• Use of HF order sets to monitor clinical status and apply basic principles of HF management (i.e. dietary compliance and diuretic use) • Incorporate management for non-HF patients at risk for developing HF • Assess and manage comorbidities • Focus on HFpEF • Incorporation of geriatric principles into HF management strategies • Use the 2015 Scientific Statement on HF Management in SNFs13 |
|
• Patient Monitoring | • Lack of standardized monitoring processes • Nuanced and unfamiliar triggers of HF exacerbation • Lack of control over patient choices and compliance • Nursing and nutrition service culture accustomed to improving hydration/ failure to thrive • Cognitive limitations in patients impairs symptom reporting |
• Staff education specifically to monitor nuanced factors contributing to exacerbations in SNF patients with HF (i.e. atrial arrhythmias, infection, high sodium meals/snacks) | • Collective nursing effort to monitor at risk patients • Close monitoring of weights, diuretic needs, dietary choices, symptoms • Improved training on triggers for HF exacerbation in SNF HFpEF patients Notification to physician of changes in physiologic status • Monitoring status of comorbid illnesses |
|
• Timely interventions | • Lack of standardization of protocols for timely intervention specific to HF patients • Lack of staff training to administer interventions and/or IV medications |
• Increased use of quality improvement interventions • Train on HF specific interventions, including IV medication administration • Compliance with CMS proposal for physician bedside encounter prior to hospital transfer |
• Use of Interact II52 to assess clinical changes • Broaden assessment and interventions to incorporate HF issues • Redirect management strategy when interventions are not effective • Improve bedside availability of SNF based physicians • Use of specialty consultation when needed |
|
Skilled Nursing Facility Characteristics | • Non-Modifiable | • Facility size • Profit status • Free standing vs. hospital based •Geographic location |
• Improved awareness of outcomes and achievement of quality metrics associated with non-modifiable facility factors | • Mindful recommendation of SNFs with non-modifiable factors for high risk patients • Cautious selection of SNFs with higher quality ratings based on non-modifiable factors, (i.e. smaller, hospital based not for profit facilities) |
• Modifiable | • Lack of resources to improve SNF staffing availability and staff to • Cultures resistant to changing administrative or admitting practices • Misaligned incentives to admit healthy patients |
• Improved NP/MD, RN, and PT/OT staffing availability • Increased preparedness for admission of high risk patients • Promoting a culture of change and com- mitment to excellence among staff • Improved administrative policies on staff education and team building • Building collaborative networks with hospitals and community providers |
• Selection of SNFs for high risk patients with emphasis on quality of care • Administrative leadership investment in quality improvement • Motivate to establish partnerships with referral networks. |
SNF, Skilled Nursing Facility; HF, Heart Failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PCP, Primary care provider; DMP, disease management program; HFpEF, Heart failure with preserved EF; IV, intravenous; CMS, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; NP, nurse practitioner; MD, Doctor of medicine; RN, registered nurse; PT, physical therapy; OT, occupational therapy.