Table 4.
Emergency surgery in COVID-19 + cases
Number | Percent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Surgical interventions in COVID-19+ | No | 48 | 67.6 |
Yes | 23 | 32.4 | |
Indications to surgery1 | Very urgent diseases2 | 16 | 22.5 |
Urgent diseases3 | 11 | 15.5 | |
Trauma | 3 | 4.2 | |
Elective oncologic surgery | 4 | 5.6 | |
Surgical approach | Only laparoscopy | 5 | 7.0 |
Only open | 8 | 11.3 | |
Open and laparoscopy | 10 | 14.1 | |
Comparison with the number of February–March 2019 emergency interventions | Increased | 8 | 11.3 |
Reduced | 39 | 54.9 | |
Stable | 24 | 33.8 | |
Unusual delay in presentation for urgent pathology4 | Yes | 28 | 39.4 |
No | 43 | 60.6 | |
Increase in post-operative complication rate | Yes | 5 | 7.1 |
No | 66 | 92.9 |
1In each center, more than 1 answer was reported
2For example, bowel perforations, diffuse peritonitis, and septic shock, hemorrhages with shock, bowel ischemia, and necrosis
3For example, acute appendicitis with localized peritonitis, acute cholecystitis, and obstruction
4For example, unusual high rate of acute gangrenous appendicitis, perforated cholecystitis, and stanched bowel perforation