Table 8.
Comparison from different methods on CL317 dataset by jackknife test
| Methods | Jackknife test (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | OA | ||||||
| Cy | En | Me | Mi | Nu | Se | ||
| ID [5] | 81.3 | 83.0 | 81.8 | 85.3 | 82.7 | 88.2 | 82.7 |
| ID_SVM [6] | 91.1 | 87.2 | 89.1 | 79.4 | 73.1 | 58.8 | 84.2 |
| DF_SVM [7] | 92.9 | 86.5 | 85.5 | 76.5 | 93.6 | 76.5 | 88.0 |
| PSSM-AC [8] | 93.8 | 95.7 | 90.9 | 91.2 | 86.5 | 82.4 | 91.5 |
| Liang et al. [32] | 92.9 | 93.6 | 89.1 | 82.4 | 84.6 | 76.5 | 89.0 |
| Zhang et al. [44] | 96.1 | 100 | 95.7 | 93.9 | 95.5 | 98.0 | 96.0 |
| FTC-DFMCA-PSSM [11] | 92.9 | 93.6 | 89.1 | 82.4 | 86.5 | 93.6 | 89.0 |
| MACC-PSSM [35] | 96.4 | 93.6 | 94.5 | 82.4 | 80.8 | 76.5 | 90.5 |
| Chen et al. [10] | 95.5 | 94.1 | 93.6 | 96.4 | 94.2 | 94.1 | 94.8 |
| ERT-ECT-PSSM-IS [45] | 93.8 | 94.1 | 100 | 97.9 | 96.2 | 92.7 | 95.0 |
| CTM-AECA-PSSM-LDA | 99.1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99.7 |