Skip to main content
. 2020 May 24;17:68. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00971-2

Table 2.

Estimated marginal means (standard error) and p-values for pairwise comparisons of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in min/day, as a function of DRD1 genotype, in the total sample and stratified by age

Total sample 66 years 81–87 years
DRD1 genotype Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
TT (lower efficacy) 32.7 (26.6, 38.7) 30.5 (23.3, 37.7) 38.8 (34.7, 42.9) 36.6 (28.4, 44.9) 14.8 (10.1, 19.6) 15.2 (8.2, 22.1)
CT (intermediate efficacy) 37.7 (31.6, 43.8) 32.7 (27.9, 37.5) 39.8 (36.1, 43.5) 32.1 (24.1, 40.2) 23.1 (18.9, 27.3) 24.5 (17.7, 31.3)
CC (higher efficacy) 39.8 (32.4, 47.2) 49.9 (40.8, 59.0) 40.8 (33.9, 47.8) 52.1 (40.3, 63.8) 27.2 (19.5, 34.9) 35.8 (26.8, 44.8)
TT vs. CC (p-value) 0.043 0.001 0.626 0.036 0.007 0.000
TT vs. CT (p-value) 0.041 0.618 0.727 0.442 0.012 0.064
CT vs. CC (p-value) 0.538 0.001 0.798 0.007 0.354 0.049

DRD1 = dopamine D1 receptor polymorphism

Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex and physical function (5 STS and OLS) and included cohort as a factor in the total sample. Main effects of the two other SNPs are not included in Model 1. In Model 2, additional adjustments were made for main (i.e., DRD1, DRD2, DRD3) and interactive effects between the other SNPs (i.e., DRD1 x DRD2, DRD1 x DRD3, DRD2 x DRD3, and DRD1 x DRD2 x DRD3)