Skip to main content
. 2020 May 24;20:459. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06919-w

Table 1.

LRIG1 copy number ratios and clinicopathological characteristics of the breast cancer cohort

Characteristic Lossa Normala Gaina P-value*
Number of patients (N = 423 77 (18.2%) 293 (69.3%) 53 (12.5%)
Age at diagnosis (years; mean ± SD) 55.7 ± 13.3 60.1 ± 11.54 62.5 ± 13.42
Age ≤ 60 (N = 211) 46 (21.8%) 142 (67.3%) 23 (10.9%) 0.125
Age > 60 (N = 212) 31 (14.6%) 151 (71.2%) 30 (14.2%)
Steroid receptor status <  0.001
 Negative (N = 117) 39 (33.3%) 65 (55.6%) 13 (11.1%)
 Positive (N = 306) 38 (12.4%) 228 (74.5%) 40 (13.1%)
ERBB2status 0.002
 Negative (N = 336) 50 (14.9%) 245 (72.9%) 41 (12.2%)
 Positive (N = 87) 27 (31.0%) 48 (55.2%) 12 (13.8%)
Tumor subtype < 0.001
ERBB2+, ER/PR- (N = 45) 16 (35.6%) 23 (51.1%) 6 (13.3%)
ERBB2+, ER/PR+ (N = 42) 11 (26.2%) 25 (59.5%) 6 (14.3%)
ERBB2-, ER/PR+ (N = 264) 27 (10.2%) 203 (76.9%) 34 (12.9%)
ERBB2-, ER/PR- (N = 72) 23 (31.9%) 42 (58.3%) 7 (9.7%)
Disease stage (N = 278; missing data = 145) 0.151
 I (N = 109) 18 (16.5%) 84 (77.1%) 7 (6.4%)
 II (N = 131) 28 (21.4%) 85 (64.9%) 18 (13.7%)
 III (N = 7) 1 (14.3%) 5 (71.4%) 1 (14.3%)
 IV (N = 31) 6 (19.4%) 17 (54.8%) 8 (25.8%)
Tumor grade (N = 363, missing data = 60) 0.004
 I (N = 31) 1 (3.2%) 25 (80.6%) 5 (16.1%)
 II (N = 137) 15 (10.9%) 104 (75.9%) 18 (13.1%)
 III (N = 195) 50 (25.6%) 120 (61.5%) 25 (12.8%)
Tumor size (N = 329, missing data = 94) 0.158
 Size ≤20 mm (N = 154) 29 (18.8%) 111 (72.1%) 14 (9.1%)
 Size > 20 mm (N = 175) 37 (21.1%) 111 (63.4%) 27 (15.4%)
Nodal status (N = 360, missing data = 63) 0.001
 Negative (N = 279) 43 (15.4%) 207 (74.2%) 29 (10.4%)
 Positive (N = 81) 24 (29.6%) 43 (53.1%) 14 (17.3%)
Tumor types 0.041
 Ductal (N = 354) 66 (18.6%) 237 (66.9%) 51 (14.4%)
 Lobular (N = 35) 5 (14.3%) 30 (85.7%) 0 (0.0%)
 Others (N = 34) 6 (17.6%) 26 (76.5%) 2 (5.9%)

aLRIG1/CYP1B1 ratio < 0.85, loss; 0.85–1.15, normal; > 1.15, gain

*The overall P values are from comparisons between all LRIG1 loss, LRIG1 normal and LRIG1 gain groups. Significance was calculated by the 2-sided Fisher’s exact test