Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;100(3):487–499. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa002

Table 3.

Prevalence and Association of Lymphedema Symptoms and Diagnosis by Household Income

Household Income, $ a
Lymphedema Signs and Symptoms ≤10 K (n = 114) 10,001–20 K (n = 127) 20,001–40 K (n = 136) ≥40,001 (n = 137) P b
Self-reported edema
Breast 24 (21.1) 10 (7.9) 9 (6.6) 11 (8.0) .0074
Axilla 25 (21.9) 21 (16.5) 21 (15.4) 15 (10.9) .0218
Arm 38 (33.3) 36 (28.3) 43 (31.6) 36 (26.3) .2987
Hand 22 (19.3) 27 (21.3) 25 (18.4) 19 (13.9) .1542
Skin hardening 29 (25.4) 16 (12.6) 12 (8.8) 9 (6.6) <.0001
Skin pitting .0599
Stays down like a pit 18 (15.8) 8 (6.3) 12 (8.8) 9 (6.6)
Comes right back up 90 (78.9) 114 (89.8) 116 (85.2) 125 (91.2)
Skin does not yield 4 (3.5) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.5)
Skin darkening 22 (19.3) 22 (17.3) 13 (9.6) 7 (5.1) .0001
Heaviness from edema 40 (35.1) 27 (21.3) 34 (25.0) 24 (17.5) .0062
Lymphedema diagnosisc 16 (32.7) 22 (56.4) 24 (66.7) 24 (85.7) .0194
a

Values are reported as numbers (percentages) of women unless otherwise indicated. K = thousand.

b

P values for differences between income groups were from Cochran-Armitage tests of trend or the Fisher exact test, when appropriate, for categorical characteristics.

c

Among participants reporting lymphedema signs or symptoms (≤10 K, n = 49; 10,001–20 K, n = 39; 20,001–40 K, n = 36; and ≥ 40,001, n = 28).