Table 2.
Self-reported non-transformed opioid consumption (mean ± standard deviation) at each price point with and without cannabis available.
| Opioid consumption alone | Opioid consumption, cannabis available | Effect size Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price Points | US$0.01* | 6.2 ± 4.7 | 5.8 ± 4.2 | .15 |
| US$0.03 | 5.5 ± 4.1 | 5.3 ± 3.5 | - | |
| US$0.10 | 5.3 ± 3.5 | 5.1 ± 3.3 | - | |
| US$0.30 | 5.1 ± 3.5 | 4.7 ± 3.2 | - | |
| US$1* | 4.7 ± 3.2 | 4.0 ± 2.9 | .33 | |
| US$3* | 3.7 ± 3.1 | 3.1 ± 2.4 | .32 | |
| US$10* | 2.4 ± 2.6 | 2.0 ± 2.3 | .23 | |
| US$30*# | 1.5 ± 2.4 | 0.9 ± 1.5 | .35 | |
| US$100* | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | .23 | |
| US$300 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | - | |
| US$1000 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | - |
Price points with an asterisk (*) and bolded data indicate there was a significant effect at p < .05 and a hash (#) indicates there was a significant effect at Bonferroni corrected p < .005 of cannabis availability on opioid consumption when transformed data were analyzed, Cohen’s d characterizes the effect size of the matched-pairs t-test at each individual price point.