Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;34(5):e23171. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23171

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of AML patients

Items AML patients (N = 221)
Age (years), mean ± SD 52.1 ± 14.9
Gender, No. (%)
Female 85 (38.5)
Male 136 (61.5)
FAB classification, No. (%)
M2 79 (35.7)
M4 65 (29.4)
M5 66 (29.9)
M6 11 (5.0)
Cytogenetics, No. (%)
NK 113 (51.1)
CK 25 (11.3)
inv(16) or t(16;16) 17 (7.7)
t(8;21) 10 (4.5)
+8 7 (3.2)
−7 or 7q‐ 7 (3.2)
t(9;11) 7 (3.2)
11q23 6 (2.7)
t(9;22) 4 (1.8)
inv(3) or t(3;3) 2 (0.9)
−5 or 5q‐ 1 (0.5)
t(6;9) 1 (0.5)
Others (non‐defined) 21 (9.5)
MK, No. (%) 19 (8.6)
Molecular genetics mutation, No. (%)
FLT3‐ITD mutation 48 (21.7)
Isolated biallelic CEBPA mutation 22 (10.0)
NPMI mutation 78 (35.3)
Risk stratification, No. (%)
Favorable‐risk 58 (26.3)
Intermediate‐risk 88 (39.8)
Poor‐risk 75 (33.9)
WBC (×109/L), median (IQR) 17.0 (8.5‐29.2)
Induction therapy regimens, No. (%)
Daunorubicin + cytarabine 96 (43.4)
Idarubicin + cytarabine 85 (38.5)
Anthracenedione mitoxantrone + cytarabine 40 (18.1)

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer‐binding protein α; CK, complex karyotype; FAB classification, French‐American‐Britain classification; FLT3‐ITD, internal tandem duplications in the FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3; IQR, interquartile range; MK, monosomal karyotype; NK, normal karyotype; NPM1, nucleophosmin 1; SD, standard deviation; WBC, white blood cell.