Table 4.
Logistic Regression for Successful Aging related Variables, N = 10,074.
| Level | Variables | Categories | Successful Aging |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | |||
| Individual | Age (year) | 65–74 | 2.18 (1.86–2.55) *** |
| ≥75 | 1 | ||
| Sex | Male | 1.19 (1.02–1.38) * | |
| Female | 1 | ||
| Educational level | No education | 1 | |
| Elementary school | 1.44 (1.13–1.83) ** | ||
| ≥Middle school | 2.13 (1.68–2.70) *** | ||
| Economic Status | 1st quintile | 1 | |
| 2nd quintile | 1.29 (0.87–1.90) | ||
| 3rd quintile | 1.79 (1.23–2.61) ** | ||
| 4th quintile | 2.33 (1.59–3.40) *** | ||
| 5th quintile | 2.55 (1.73–3.76) *** | ||
| Heavy drinking | Yes | 1 | |
| No | 1.32 (1.15–1.52) *** | ||
| Subjective health status | Good | 6.33 (5.21–7.70) *** | |
| Fair | 2.73 (2.18–3.41) *** | ||
| Poor | 1 | ||
| Health screening | Yes | 1.58 (1.29–1.93) *** | |
| No | 1 | ||
| Family | Living arrangement | Living alone | 1.54 (1.14–2.08) * |
| Living with spouse | 1.11 (0.93-1.33) | ||
| Living with children | 1 | ||
| Satisfaction with spouse | Satisfaction | 1.81 (1.22–2.68) ** | |
| Usual | 1.08 (0.79–1.49) | ||
| Dissatisfaction | 1 | ||
| Contact with family/siblings/relatives (time/month) | <1 | 1 | |
| 1–4 | 1.14 (0.99–1.32) | ||
| ≥5 | 1.32 (1.12–1.56) *** | ||
| Community | Contact with friends/neighbors (time/month) |
<1 | 1 |
| 1–4 | 2.33 (1.20–4.52) * | ||
| ≥5 | 4.10 (2.33–7.22) *** | ||
| Number of close friends/neighbors | 1.06 (1.03–1.09) *** | ||
| Accessibility to neighborhood facilities | 0.95 (0.93–0.97) *** | ||
| (Constant) | 0.01 *** | ||
| Correct prediction (%) | 86.9 | ||
| Hosmer–Lemeshow test | x2 = 6.99, df = 8, p = 0.538 | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.261 | ||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.