Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;17(9):3157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093157

Table 1.

Heart rate variability results of rural and city school students.

Variables RSG CSG T p-Value 95% Confidence Cohen’s D
n = 75 n = 106 Lower Upper
HRmean 105.37 ± 61.91 98.74 ± 13.15 0.976 0.331 −6.79 20.05 −0.11
RMSSD 67.00 ± 25.59 61.25 ± 36.02 1.091 0.277 −4.66 16.15 −0.22
pNN50 30.33 ± 15.52 23.27 ± 15.44 2.777 0.006 2.03 12.08 −0.45
LF 67.99 ± 16.78 64.12 ± 16.48 1.426 0.156 −1.50 9.33 −0.23
HF 30.87 ± 16.27 35.71 ± 16.38 −1.808 0.073 −10.21 0.45 0.30
LF_HF 4.23 ± 5.42 2.60 ± 2.40 1.413 0.160 −3.60 14.70 −0.15
SD1 47.43 ± 18.12 43.36 ± 25.50 1.092 0.277 −2.92 11.06 −0.22
SD2 121.91 ± 70.66 112.46 ± 57.34 0.910 0.365 −11.81 30.72 −0.13

RSG, rural school group; CSG, city school group; HRmean, heart rate mean; RMSSD, root-mean square differences of successive heartbeat intervals; pNN50, percentage of successive RR-interval pairs differing in more than 50 milliseconds in the entire recording divided by the total number of RR waves intervals; LF: low-frequency band; HF: high-frequency band; LF/HF Ratio; SD1, transverse axis; SD2, longitudinal axis.