Table 2.
Associations between unsafe cycling behaviors and both type of cyclist and type of cycling area in Changsha, China (n = 15,468).
| Variable | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| Type of cyclist (Ref. = personal bike riders) | |||||
| Shared bike riders | 18.97 (12.59, 28.57) ** | 0.63 (0.52, 0.77) ** | 2.08 (1.75, 2.48) ** | 0.85 (0.64, 1.12) | 0.88 (0.77, 1.00) |
| Cycling area (Ref. = scenic area) | |||||
| University area | 9.43 (5.42, 16.39) ** | 0.70 (0.56, 0.86) * | 0.72 (0.61, 0.84) ** | 0.74 (0.55, 1.01) | 1.26 (1.06, 1.50) * |
| Office area | 2.27 (1.35, 3.79) * | 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) ** | 1.33 (1.13, 1.58) * | 0.56 (0.39, 0.80) * | 0.35 (0.29, 0.41) ** |
| Shopping area | 1.03 (0.55, 1.91) | - | 1.96 (1.59, 2.43) ** | 0.6 (0.35, 1.02) | 0.24 (0.19, 0.29) ** |
Note: A: not wearing a helmet, B: cycling through a red light, C: riding in opposite direction of traffic, D: holding the handlebar with one hand or without hand, E: riding on motorway or sidewalk. Behavior B was not observed in the shopping area. *: p < 0.05. **: p < 0.01.