Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;17(9):3203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093203

Table 3.

Comparison of body function (n = 30).

Body Function Experimental Group (n = 15) Control Group (n = 15) t p
ROM Rt (°)
pretest 85.38 ± 22.42 79.05 ± 15.36
posttest 122.24 ± 11.60 120.01 ± 12.01
Pre-post 36.86 ± 19.59 40.96 ± 18.53 −0.590 0.560
t(p) −7.288 (0.000) −8.560 (0.000)
ROM Lt (°)
pretest 84.25 ± 20.54 78.75 ± 16.14
posttest 128.79 ± 8.91 119.04 ± 12.63
Pre-post 44.53 ± 20.40 40.29 ± 20.11 0.574 0.570
t(p) −8.453 (0.000) −7.759 (0.000)
PPT Rt (kg/cm2)
pretest 2.63 ± 0.54 2.88 ± 0.94
posttest 3.74 ± 0.62 3.29 ± 0.75
Pre-post 1.11 ± 0.47 0.40 ± 0.67 3.318 0.003
t(p) −9.082 (0.000) −2.307 (0.037)
PPT Lt (kg/cm2)
pretest 2.75 ± 0.49 2.69 ± 0.72
posttest 3.83 ± 0.58 2.99 ± 0.61
Pre-post 1.08 ± 0.59 0.31 ± 1.05 2.489 0.019
t(p) −7.077 (0.000) −1.141 (0.273)

p < 0.05, Mean ± SD; ROM = range of motion; Rt= right side; Lt = left side; PPT = pressure pain threshold.