Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;17(9):3203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093203

Table 5.

Comparison of balance test (n = 30).

Balance Experimental Group (n = 15) Control Group (n = 15) t p
CEA
pretest 485.93 ± 93.98 417.71 ± 107.65
posttest 274.82 ± 157.38 368.49 ± 125.18
Pre-post 211.11 ± 154.37 49.22 ± 105.37 3.355 0.002
t (p) 5.296 (0.000) 1.809 (0.092)
PL
pretest 361.16 ± 59.23 305.51 ± 116.36
posttest 265.69 ± 102.63 303.24 ± 73.20
Pre-post 95.47 ± 115.47 2.27 ± 113.56 2.229 0.034
t (p) 3.202 (0.006) 0.077 (0.939)
AV
pretest 12.80 ± 2.31 10.82 ± 4.00
posttest 9.91 ± 2.48 11.20 ± 2.71
Pre-post 2.89 ± 3.61 −0.38 ± 3.56 2.499 0.019
t (p) 3.106 (0.008) −0.411 (0.687)
TUG
pretest 26.08 ± 12.19 24.84 ± 7.81
posttest 11.89 ± 2.50 19.66 ± 5.89
Pre-post 14.19 ± 10.78 5.17 ± 4.22 3.016 0.007
t (p) 5.096 (0.000) 4.752 (0.000)

p < 0.05, Mean ± SD; CEA = 95% confidence ellipse area; PL = COP path length; AV = COP average velocity; TUG = time up and go test.