. 2020 May 1;17(9):3152. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093152

Table 2.

Results of the regression analyses.

	Emotional Exhaustion						Depersonalization						Personal Accomplishment
	Model 1a		Model 2a		Model 3a		Model 1b		Model 2b		Model 3b		Model 1c		Model 2c		Model 3c
	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE	β	SE
Physical aggression
Intercept	3.26	0.04	3.32	0.05	3.33	0.05	2.21	0.03	2.21	0.04	2.22	0.04	4.74	0.02	4.73	0.03	4.72	0.03
PA	0.18 ***	0.03	0.20 ***	0.03	0.28 ***	0.03	0.24 ***	0.02	0.25 ***	0.02	0.32 ***	0.03	−0.14 **	0.02	−0.15 **	0.02	−0.22 ***	0.02
FC ¹			−0.09*	0.09	−0.07	0.09			−0.01	0.08	0.01	0.03			0.03	0.06	0.02	0.06
PA × FC					−0.13 *	0.06					−0.12 *	0.03					0.11 *	0.03
R ²	0.03		0.036		0.044		0.058		0.057		0.063		0.018		0.017		0.023
∆R²			0.006		0.008				−0.001		0.006				−0.001		0.006
Verbal aggression
Intercept	3.26	0.04	3.31	0.05	3.32	0.05	2.21	0.03	2.21	0.04	2.21	0.04	4.73	0.02	4.82	0.03	4.81	0.03
VA	0.21 ***	0.02	0.23 ***	0.02	0.28 ***	0.02	0.24 ***	0.02	0.24 ***	0.02	0.30 ***	0.02	−0.17 **	0.02	−0.17 ***	0.02	−0.22 ***	0.02
FC ¹			−0.09*	0.09	−0.08 *	0.09			0.00	0.08	0.02	0.08			0.03	0.06	0.02	0.06
VA × FC					−0.10	0.05					−0.10 *	0.04					0.09	0.03
R ²	0.044		0.050		0.054		0.057		0.056		0.061		0.026		0.026		0.030
∆R²			0.006		0.004				−0.001		0.005				0.000		0.004

Note: N = 582; PA = physical aggression; VA = verbal aggression; FC = follow-up counseling; β = standardized coefficients; SE = Standard Error; ¹ 0 = no follow-up counseling, 1 = follow-up counseling; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.