Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;36(1):25–32. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v36i1.7106

Table 5.

Neuroimaging

N (%)
CT Head (N=52)
Normal 16 (31)
Atrophy 8 (15)
Hydrocephalus 7 (13)
Parenchymal lesion 5 (10)
Ischemic white matter 3 (6)
Meninges 3 (6)
Cavernous Sinus 2 (4)
Infarct 2 (4)
Parenchyma and Meninges 2 (4)
Pituitary lesion 2 (4)
Encephalomalacia 1 (2)
Meningioma mimic 1 (2)
MRI Brain (N=52)
Optic Nerve/Chiasm 12 (23)
Meninges 11 (21)
Parenchyma and Meninges 9 (17)
Hydrocephalus 5 (10)
High T2 signal 4 (8)
Cavernous Sinus 3 (6)
Pituitary 3 (6)
Meningioma mimic 3 (6)
Encephalomalacia 1 (2)
Normal 1 (2)
Parenchyma only 2 (4)
Spine MRI Regions (N=19)
Cervical 8 (42)
Thoracic 6 (32)
Cervical and Thoracic 5 (26)
Spine MRI abnormalities (N=19)
Cord parenchyma and meninges 13 (68)
Cord parenchyma only 4 (21)
Cord atrophy 1 (5)
Meninges only 1 (5)

* Two patients had Brain MRI abnormalities fitting in more than one of the chosen categories