Skip to main content
. 2020 May 24;17:73. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00923-w

Table 5.

Validation Results for Non indicated Childbirth Care Practice Quality indicators in Northern Ethiopia (N = 455)

Indicators Women’s reported prevalence (%) True prevalence (%) Sensitivity of women’s self-report (95% CI) Specificity of women’s self-report (95% CI) Population survey estimate (Pr) AUC (95% CI) IF Criteria Met
Stretching of perineum during second stage of labor 14.51 13.63 33.87(22.33–47.00) 87.02(83.29–90.18) 15.83 0.60(0.56–0.65) 1.16 Both
Episiotomy performed without indication 25.49 24.62 37.5(28.53–47.15) 76.68(71.84–81.05) 26.82 0.60(0.55–0.65) 1.09 Both
Apply fundal pressure to hasten delivery 6.15 4.18 57.89(33.50–79.74) 95.18(92.73–96.99) 7.04 0.76(0.72–0.80) 1.68 AUC
Artificial rupture of membrane 6.59 5.27 41.67(22.11–63.35) 93.04(90.21–95.25) 8.79 0.67(0.62–0.71) 1.67 AUC
Restriction of foods and fluids 14.95 7.69 37.14(21.47–55.08) 85.48(81.74–88.70) 16.26 0.64(0.61–0.69) 2.11 AUC
Digital vaginal examination less than four hours frequency 22.64 17.36 51.90(40.36–63.29) 80.32(75.93–84.22) 25.27 0.67(0.62–0.71) 1.46 AUC
Routine intravenous fluid infusion for all laboring women 31.65 15.82 72.22(60.41–82.14) 75.46(70.83–79.69) 32.09 0.74(0.69–0.78) 2.03 AUC
Hold newborn upside down 3.96 4.62 33.87(22.33–47.00) 87.02(83.29–90.18) 13.95 0.55(0.50–0.60) 3.02 No

Notes: True prevalence indicates observers’ prevalence

Criteria Met - Indicator met either both AUC and IF, AUC only or IF only after validation analysis done

IF Inflation factor, AUC Area under receiver operating characteristic curve