Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;8(6):E738–E747. doi: 10.1055/a-1122-8674

Table 3. Comparison between FNA and FNB based on EUS-tissue sampling access.

Transgastric access Total FNA FNB P value
Sensitivity 85.40 % (95 % CI, 80.11 to 89.73) 84.29 % (95 % CI, 73.62 to 91.89) 87.01 % (95 % CI, 80.66 to 91.88) 0.546
Specificity 97.78 % (95 % CI, 88.23 to 99.94) 100.00 % (95 % CI, 81.47 to 100.00) 96.30 % (95 % CI, 81.03 to 99.91) 0.977
Positive likelihood ratio 38.43 (95 % CI, 5.53 to 267.11) NA 23.49 (95 % CI, 3.43 to 160.94) NA
Negative likelihood ratio 0.15 (95 % CI, 0.11 to 0.21) 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.27) 0.13 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.20) 0.951
Positive predictive value 99.48 % (95 % CI, 96.52 to 99.93) 100.00 % 99.26 % (95 % CI, 95.14 to 99.89) 0.419
Negative predictive value 57.14 % (95 % CI, 49.23 to 64.70) 62.07 % (95 % CI, 48.75 to 73.79) 56.52 % (95 % CI, 46.18 to 66.33) 0.387
Accuracy 87.45 % (95 % CI, 82.91 to 91.15) 87.50 % (95 % CI, 78.73 to 93.59) 88.40 % (95 % CI, 82.81 to 92.67) 0.831
Transduodenal access
Sensitivity 89.12 % (95 % CI, 84.471 to 92.77) 85.71 % (95 % CI, 75.87 to 92.65) 90.74 % (95 % CI, 85.19 to 94.72) 0.214
Specificity 96.97 % (95 % CI, 84.24 to 99.92) 90.91 % (95 % CI, 58.72 to 99.77) 100.00 % (95 % CI, 84.56 to 100.00) 0.943
Positive likelihood ratio 29.41 (95 % CI, 4.27 to 202.74) 9.43 (95 % CI, 1.45 to 61.24) NA NA
Negative likelihood ratio 0.11 (95 % CI, 0.08 to 0.16) 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.28) 0.09 (95 % CI, 0.106 to 0.15) 0.482
Positive predictive value 99.53 % (95 % CI, 96.87 to 99.93) 98.51 % (95 % CI, 91.04 to 99.77) 100.00 % 0.991
Negative predictive value 55.17 % (95 % CI, 46.00 to 64.00) 47.62 % (95 % CI, 33.77 to 61.84) 59.46 % (95 % CI, 47.53 to 70.37) 0.902
Accuracy 90.07 % (95 % CI, 85.89 to 93.36) 86.36 % (95 % CI, 77.39 to 92.75) 91.85 % (95 % CI, 86.91 to 95.37) 0.157

FNA, fine-needle aspiration; FNB, fine-needle biopsy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound