Table 3. Comparison between FNA and FNB based on EUS-tissue sampling access.
Transgastric access | Total | FNA | FNB | P value |
Sensitivity | 85.40 % (95 % CI, 80.11 to 89.73) | 84.29 % (95 % CI, 73.62 to 91.89) | 87.01 % (95 % CI, 80.66 to 91.88) | 0.546 |
Specificity | 97.78 % (95 % CI, 88.23 to 99.94) | 100.00 % (95 % CI, 81.47 to 100.00) | 96.30 % (95 % CI, 81.03 to 99.91) | 0.977 |
Positive likelihood ratio | 38.43 (95 % CI, 5.53 to 267.11) | NA | 23.49 (95 % CI, 3.43 to 160.94) | NA |
Negative likelihood ratio | 0.15 (95 % CI, 0.11 to 0.21) | 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.27) | 0.13 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.20) | 0.951 |
Positive predictive value | 99.48 % (95 % CI, 96.52 to 99.93) | 100.00 % | 99.26 % (95 % CI, 95.14 to 99.89) | 0.419 |
Negative predictive value | 57.14 % (95 % CI, 49.23 to 64.70) | 62.07 % (95 % CI, 48.75 to 73.79) | 56.52 % (95 % CI, 46.18 to 66.33) | 0.387 |
Accuracy | 87.45 % (95 % CI, 82.91 to 91.15) | 87.50 % (95 % CI, 78.73 to 93.59) | 88.40 % (95 % CI, 82.81 to 92.67) | 0.831 |
Transduodenal access | ||||
Sensitivity | 89.12 % (95 % CI, 84.471 to 92.77) | 85.71 % (95 % CI, 75.87 to 92.65) | 90.74 % (95 % CI, 85.19 to 94.72) | 0.214 |
Specificity | 96.97 % (95 % CI, 84.24 to 99.92) | 90.91 % (95 % CI, 58.72 to 99.77) | 100.00 % (95 % CI, 84.56 to 100.00) | 0.943 |
Positive likelihood ratio | 29.41 (95 % CI, 4.27 to 202.74) | 9.43 (95 % CI, 1.45 to 61.24) | NA | NA |
Negative likelihood ratio | 0.11 (95 % CI, 0.08 to 0.16) | 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.28) | 0.09 (95 % CI, 0.106 to 0.15) | 0.482 |
Positive predictive value | 99.53 % (95 % CI, 96.87 to 99.93) | 98.51 % (95 % CI, 91.04 to 99.77) | 100.00 % | 0.991 |
Negative predictive value | 55.17 % (95 % CI, 46.00 to 64.00) | 47.62 % (95 % CI, 33.77 to 61.84) | 59.46 % (95 % CI, 47.53 to 70.37) | 0.902 |
Accuracy | 90.07 % (95 % CI, 85.89 to 93.36) | 86.36 % (95 % CI, 77.39 to 92.75) | 91.85 % (95 % CI, 86.91 to 95.37) | 0.157 |
FNA, fine-needle aspiration; FNB, fine-needle biopsy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound