Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Apr 9;120(6):1034–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.01.017

Table 2:

Appetite, Gut Peptide, and Food Intake Data for the CTL vs RS2 Groups in the STARCH Trial (N=59). Data are mean ± SEM.

CTL
Week 0
CTL
Week 12
RS2
Week 0
RS2
Week 12
Δ CTL vs RS2 p-value
Δ CTL vs RS2
Visual Analog Scaleb (AUC; score x min)
Feelings of hunger 8034.2 ± 786.2 8568.3 ± 760.8 10375.0 ± 823.4 9870.9 ± 798.1 1038.2 ± 903.5 0.25
Feelings of fullness 9869.6 ± 742.0 10162.0 ± 693.7 8004.6 ± 777.1 8134.5 ± 728.0 162.3 ± 965.0 0.86
Desire to eat 8513.2 ± 767.7 9377.3 ± 761.4 11581.0 ± 804.0 10649.0 ± 799.1 1795.9 ± 1041.3 0.09
Prospective food consumption 9141.6 ± 751.3 9660.8 ± 718.4 11796.0 ± 786.8 10961.0 ± 753.9 1353.7 ± 973.5 0.17
Satisfaction 9246.2 ± 712.3 9620.7 ± 668.9 7491.1 ± 746.0 7886.9 ± 702.0 −21.4 ± 976.3 0.98
Eating Inventoryc (sub-scale)
Cognitive Restraint of Eating 8.8 ± 0.7 10.0 ± 0.7 9.1 ± 0.8 9.8 ± 0.8 0.4 ± 0.9 0.61
Disinhibition 7.3 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.6 7.7 ± 0.7 7.4 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.5 0.24
Hunger 4.4 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.6 6.0 ± 0.6 5.6 ± 0.6 0.7 ± 0.6 0.25
Gut Peptides
GLP-1 (AUC) (pmol/L x min) 16 ± 2 15 ± 2 18 ± 3 18 ± 3 −0.6 ± 0.6 0.61
PYY (AUC) (pg/mL x min) 487 ± 27 468 ± 26 490 ± 25 444 ± 31 28 ± 15 0.34
Total ghrelin (AUC) (pg/mL x min) 1946 ± 108 1945 ± 135 1879 ± 112 1963 ± 140 −85 ± 76 0.26
Active ghrelin (AUC) (pg/mL x min) 340 ± 22 333 ± 20 308 ± 23 318 ± 21 −17 ± 23 0.47
Food Intake Test
Total intake (kcal) 692.1 ± 40.7 740.1 ± 43.3 895.7 ± 42.7 903.1 ± 45.4 40.5 ± 38.8 0.30
CHO intake (kcal) 341.1 ± 21.9 360.6 ± 24.4 453.9 ± 23.0 438.1 ± 25.6 35.2 ± 22.0 0.11
Protein intake (kcal) 142.1 ± 7.7 151.6 ± 9.2 172.7 ± 8.1 188.0 ± 9.7 −5.8 ± 12.3 0.64
Fat intake (kcal) 218.4 ± 14.8 238.3 ± 15.3 282.7 ± 15.6 289.2 ± 16.1 13.4 ± 15.0 0.37
CHO consumed (%) 49.3 ± 0.9 48.4 ± 1.2 50.5 ± 0.9 48.1 ± 1.2 1.4 ± 1.8 0.43
Protein consumed (%) 20.7 ± 0.7 20.8 ± 0.8 19.8 ± 0.7 21.3 ± 0.9 −1.5 ± 1.1 0.19
Fat consumed (%) 31.2 ± 0.6 32.0 ± 0.6 31.0 ± 0.6 31.7 ± 0.7 0.2 ± 0.9 0.81
Remote Food Photography Method
Total intake (kcal) 1599.2 ± 87.8 1301.8 ± 83.1 1849.4 ± 95.6 1682.9 ± 90.5 130.9 ± 125.0 0.30
CHO intake (kcal) 785.1 ± 44.4 538.9 ± 42.8 882.4 ± 48.4 715.0 ± 46.6 78.6 ± 66.4 0.24
Protein intake (kcal) 276.5 ± 15.3 238.3 ± 13.8 333.0 ± 16.7 302.9 ± 15.0 8.0 ± 26.6 0.76
Fat intake (kcal) 537.6 ± 36.0 524.5 ± 34.7 633.8 ± 39.2 665 ± 37.8 44.2 ± 49.4 0.37
CHO intake (%) 49.2 ± 0.9 40.6 ± 1.2 47.8 ± 1.0 42.0 ± 1.4 2.8 ± 2.0 0.17
Protein intake (%) 17.6 ± 0.5 18.5 ± 0.5 18.0 ± 0.5 18.3 ± 0.5 −0.7 ± 0.9 0.46
Fat intake (%) 33.0 ± 1.0 41.0 ± 1.0 34.0 ± 1.0 40.0 ± 1.0 −2.0 ± 2.0 0.22

Abbreviations: AUC, are a under the curve; CHO, carbohydrate; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; PYY, peptide YY

a

Values are raw means ± SEMs.

b

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to rate average subjective appetite measures over the previous week on a 0 to 100-unit scale. Higher scores indicate greater levels of the construct being measured33.

c

Eating Inventory was used to rate average subjective appetite measures over the previous week on a 0 to 100-unit scale. Higher scores indicate greater levels of the construct being measured34,35.