Table 3.
Results.
| Controls |
Main Effects |
Full Model |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesized relationship | β | β | β | |||||||
| H1a | Health stress → emotional exhaustion | 0.33 | ** | 0.14 | * | |||||
| H1b | Health stress → diminished personal accomplishment | 0.23 | ** | 0.17 | ** | |||||
| H1c | Health stress → depersonalization | 0.44 | ** | 0.20 | ** | |||||
| H2a | Relationship stress → emotional exhaustion | 0.17 | ** | 0.20 | ** | |||||
| H2b | Relationship stress → diminished personal accomplishment | 0.16 | ** | 0.20 | ** | |||||
| H2c | Relationship stress → depersonalization | 0.06 | 0.12 | * | ||||||
| H3a | Financial stress → emotional exhaustion | 0.20 | ** | 0.13 | ** | |||||
| H3b | Financial stress → diminished personal accomplishment | -0.06 | -0.05 | |||||||
| H3c | Financial stress → depersonalization | 0.16 | * | 0.09 | * | |||||
| H4a | Emotional exhaustion → performance | -0.20 | * | -0.16 | * | |||||
| H4b | Diminished personal accomplishment → performance | -0.33 | ** | -0.42 | ** | |||||
| H4c | Depersonalization → performance | -0.29 | ** | -0.36 | ** | |||||
| Controls | ||||||||||
| Role ambiguity → emotional exhaustion | 0.13 | ** | 0.11 | * | ||||||
| Role ambiguity → diminished personal accomplishment | 0.61 | ** | 0.59 | ** | ||||||
| Role ambiguity → depersonalization | 0.15 | ** | 0.16 | ** | ||||||
| Role ambiguity → performance | -0.18 | ** | -0.15 | ** | ||||||
| Role conflict → emotional exhaustion | 0.25 | ** | 0.20 | ** | ||||||
| Role conflict → diminished personal accomplishment | -0.15 | * | -0.15 | * | ||||||
| Role conflict → depersonalization | 0.30 | ** | 0.28 | ** | ||||||
| Role conflict → performance | -0.08 | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Role overload → emotional exhaustion | 0.41 | ** | 0.34 | ** | ||||||
| Role overload → diminished personal accomplishment | 0.14 | 0.04 | ||||||||
| Role overload → depersonalization | 0.42 | ** | 0.30 | ** | ||||||
| Role overload → performance | -0.24 | ** | 0.03 | |||||||
| Gender → emotional exhaustion | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||||||
| Gender → diminished personal accomplishment | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||||||||
| Gender → depersonalization | -0.06 | -0.08 | * | |||||||
| Gender → performance | -0.12 | * | -0.12 | * | ||||||
| Indirect effects | ||||||||||
| Health stress → performance via emotional exhaustion | -0.02 | |||||||||
| Health stress → performance via diminished personal accomplishment | -0.11 | * | ||||||||
| Health stress → performance via depersonalization | -0.05 | * | ||||||||
| Relationship stress → performance via emotional exhaustion | -0.03 | |||||||||
| Relationship stress → performance via diminished personal accomplishment | -0.15 | ** | ||||||||
| Relationship stress → performance via depersonalization | -0.06 | ** | ||||||||
| Financial stress → performance via emotional exhaustion | -0.02 | |||||||||
| Financial stress → performance via diminished personal accomplishment | -0.09 | * | ||||||||
| Financial stress → performance via depersonalization | -0.04 | * | ||||||||
| Squared multiple correlations | ||||||||||
| Emotional exhaustion | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.58 | |||||||
| Diminished personal accompishment | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.48 | |||||||
| Depersonanalization | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.63 | |||||||
| Performance | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.39 | |||||||
Model fit statistics: χ2903 = 1708.74, p < 0.01, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.06, CFI = 0.90.
p < .01.
p < .05.