Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2020 Mar 5;34:100803. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2020.100803

Table 5.

Summary of recent and representative studies aiming to distinguish individuals with ASD from TD individuals using multivariate analysis of functional MRI data. Reported sample sizes are the numbers used for classification and do not necessarily reflect the study’s total sample size.

Reference Study Participants Experimental Methods Key Features Multivariate Technique Key Results
Deshpande et al. (2013)199 15 adolescents and young adults with ASD and 15 TD controls Gathered fMRI data to study causal connectivity among different brain regions relating to Theory of Mind 19 features related to effective connectivity paths SVM Classified participants with maximum 96% accuracy, 97% sensitivity, and 95% specificity
Uddin et al. (2013)200 20 children with ASD and 20 TD children Collected rs-fMRI and structural MRI data, then identified ten connectivity components associated with functional brain networks Salience network connectivity features Logistic regression Achieved 75% sensitivity and 80% specificity with leave-one-out cross-validation; also validated on an independent cohort
Plitt et al. (2015)201 59 young adults with ASD and 59 TD controls; replication set with 89 ASD and 89 TD controls Collected rs-fMRI data and defined three sets of regions of interest to create three unique correlation matrices for participants’ time series Destrieux atlas set describing 162 regions Radial basis function kernel SVM, among others Observed a maximum 77% accuracy with leave-one-out cross-validation (among other methods); results did not improve in replication set
Chanel et al. (2016)113 15 adults with ASD and 14 TD adults Gathered fMRI data to study attention/emotions of participants during static faces and dynamic bodies tasks Features from dynamic body experiment SVM Classified with maximum 92% sensitivity and 92% specificity with leave-one-out cross-validation
Yahata et al. (2016)202 74 adults with ASD and 107 TD adults; 44/27 individuals with ASD and 44/27 TD controls in validation sets 1/2 Evaluated functional connectivity from rs-fMRI; also examined generalizability to other disorders 16 out of 9730 functional connections Logistic regression Achieved 85% accuracy with leave-one-out cross-validation; validated with 75% and 70% accuracies in independent cohorts
Emerson et al. (2017)203 11 (48) infants at high risk for ASD with (without) a later diagnosis of ASD Computed features of functional connectivity from rs-fMRI at 6 months to predict ASD diagnosis at 24 months 59 sets of features (one for each fold of leave-one-out cross-validation) SVM Predicted future diagnosis with 82% sensitivity and 100% specificity using leave-one-out cross-validation