Table 4.
Variable | OR | 95% CI | p |
---|---|---|---|
CFI shape | 0.13 | 0.03–0.55 | 0.006 |
Canal–calcar ratio | < 0.01 | 0.00–0.38 | 0.032 |
Surgical approach | 0.14 | 0.71–12.04 | 0.138 |
Year of operation | 0.63 | 0.32–1.23 | 0.174 |
Gender | 0.54 | 0.14–2.12 | 0.379 |
Age | 1.02 | 0.94–1.11 | 0.599 |
Implant size | 1.35 | 0.30–6.05 | 0.696 |
CFI canal flare index
CFI shape was stovepipe, normal, or champagne flute configuration; surgical approach coded as 1 for direct lateral and 2 for posterolateral; Gender coded as 1 for male and 0 for female; implant sizes split at the median value and classified as 0 for smaller and 1 for larger size