Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;11:412. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00412

Table 2.

Data extraction table.

References VO2peak values
Absolute VO2peak Absolute VO2peak BMN VO2peak BMN VO2peak Peak power output (W) Peak power output (W) Quality appraisal
COMPARISON ACE-WERG ACE WERG ACE WERG ACE WERG Strong
Arabi et al. (1997)* 1.23 ± 0.35 1.23 ± 0.19 19.0 ± 5.2 19.2 ± 4.3 78 ± 19 ns Moderate
Bloemen et al. (2015) ns ns 19.5 ± 4.4 23.1 ± 7.3 ns ns Moderate
Gayle et al. (1990) 1.95 ± 0.35 1.98 ± 0.39 ns ns ns ns Moderate
Glaser et al. (1980) 1.77 ± 0.56 1.73 ± 0.56 ns ns ns ns Moderate
Hintzy et al. (2002) ns ns 38.9 ± 4.0 34.5 ± 3.6 111 ± 10 79 ± 12 Moderate
Martel et al. (1991) 1.88 ± 0.62 1.9 ± 0.63 ns ns 97 ± 25 74 ± 19 Moderate
Morgan et al. (2019) 1.2 ± 0.25 1.4 ± 0.31 15.9 ± 2.0 18.1 ± 2.3 61 ± 13 62 ± 17 Moderate
Pohlman et al. (1989) 1.95 ± 0.46 1.94 ± 0.39 27.5 ± 6.2 27.3 ± 7.7 ns ns Low
Price and Campbell (1999) 1.90 ± 0.4 1.96 ± 0.4 29.7 ± 8.2 31.5 ± 8.8 125 ± 24 55 ± 31 Moderate
Sedlock et al. (1990) 1.27 ± 0.29 1.19 ± 0.19 ns ns 63 ± 4 35 ± 2 Moderate
Simard et al. (1993) 0.83 ± 0.28 0.80 ± 0.27 13.0 ± 4.6 12.2 ± 4.7 23 ± 16 14 ± 17 Moderate
Tørhaug et al. (2016) 2.2 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.4 27.3 ± 5.7 27.4 ± 6.7 130 100 Moderate
Wicks et al. (1977) 1.41 ± 0.21 1.42 ± 0.22 ns ns ns ns Low
Wicks et al. (1983) 0.93 ± 0.28 1 ± 0.35 13.7 ± 4.1 14.7 ± 5.2 34 ± 8 8 ± 3 Good
0.83 ± 0.14 0.94 ± 0.29 13.1 ± 2.2 14.9 ± 4.6 43 ± 11 8 ± 3
1.62 ± 0.42 1.55 ± 0.37 23 ± 5.9 22 ± 5.2 89 ± 26 34 ± 8
1.97 ± 0.42 1.95 ± 0.45 28 ± 6.2 27.8 ± 6.4 113 ± 16 41 ± 7
1.23 ± 0.12 1.08 ± 0.16 21.7 ± 8.3 17.5 ± 8.3 65 ± 16 28 ± 5
2.01 ± 0.43 2.02 ± 0.54 31 ± 6.6 31.2 ± 7.6 116 ± 19 42 ± 7
2.26 ± 0.36 2.16 ± 0.28 37.7 ± 4.5 36.1 ± 4.7 121 ± 9 40 ± 7
COMPARISON ACE-WTR ACE WTR ACE WTR ACE WTR Moderate
Arabi et al. (1997)* 1.23 ± 0.35 1.25 ± 0.38 19 ± 5.2 19.5 ± 6.1 78 ± 19 ns Moderate
Gass and Camp (1984) 1.96 ± 0.47 2.21 ± 0.54 30.1 ± 6.6 33.8 ± 7.9 ns ns Moderate
Gass et al. (1995) 1.65 ± 0.42 1.72 ± 0.30 23.8 ± 6.0 24.8 ± 5.1 ns ns Moderate
McConnell et al. (1989) 2.15 ± 0.58 2.42 ± 0.68 30.3 ± 7.7 34.6 ± 9.9 ns ns Moderate
Pitetti et al. (1987) ns ns 31.4 ± 5.7 33.4 ± 5.7 ns ns Low
COMPARISON ACE-UBP ACE UBP ACE UBP ACE UBP Moderate
Baumgart et al. (2018b) ns ns 40.3 ± 7.3 39.5 ± 6.6 152 ± 29 127 ± 31 Good
ns ns 32.7 ± 7.0 30.3 ± 6.1 146 ± 33 118 ± 34
COMPARISON WTR-WERG WTR WERG WTR WERG WTR WERG Limited
Arabi et al. (1997)* 1.25 ± 0.38 1.23 ± 0.19 19.5 ± 6.1 19.2 ± 4.3 ns ns Moderate

Absolute (L·min−1) and body-mass normalized (BMN) (ml·kg−1·min−1) VO2peak values, peak power output (Watt) as well as information on the methodological quality for each of the studies included per mode comparison. The level of evidence for each mode comparison, which is based on the quality of the included studies, is provided in the last column in the row highlighted in gray. Data are presented as means ± SD.

VO2peak, Peak oxygen uptake; BMN, body-mass normalized; ACE, arm crank ergometry; WERG, wheelchair ergometry; WTR, wheelchair treadmill; UBP, upper-body poling; ns, not specified.