TABLE 2.
Models of coping profiles | ||||
Two classes | Three classes | Four classes | Five classes | |
AIC | 7, 045.953 | 6, 979.629 | 6, 947.676 | 6, 945.556 |
BIC | 7, 095.726 | 7, 049.311 | 7, 037.267 | 7, 055.056 |
SSA-BIC | 7, 063.964 | 7, 004.844 | 6, 980.096 | 6, 985.180 |
Entropy | 0.638 | 0.607 | 0.639 | 0.705 |
Number of groups with n ≤ 5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
LMRT | 397.586** | 71.753* | 38.571* | 9.770 |
PBLRT | 411.832** | 74.324** | 39.953** | 10.120 |
The models were adjusted assuming that the variances could differ between the indicators within each group, but it was specified as a restriction that they be equal between groups. Likewise, independence between the indicators was imposed as a restriction, both within each group and between groups. AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Schwarz Bayesian information criterion; SSA-BIC = BIC adjusted for the sample size; LMRT = adjusted Lo–Mendell–Rubin maximum likelihood ratio test; PBLRT = parametric bootstrap likelihood ratio test; *p < 0.01; **p < 0.001.