TABLE 4.
Confidence intervals | ||||
M | SE | Lower 5% | Upper 5% | |
LACS (n = 296) | ||||
Positive reappraisal | 2.45 (−0.82) | 0.06 | 2.35 | 2.55 |
Support seeking | 2.61 (−1.02) | 0.05 | 2.53 | 2.69 |
Planning | 2.42 (−0.88) | 0.06 | 2.33 | 2.52 |
HACS (n = 290) | ||||
Positive reappraisal | 3.61 (0.89) | 0.07 | 3.49 | 3.73 |
Support seeking | 4.07 (0.75) | 0.05 | 3.99 | 4.16 |
Planning | 3.72 (1.01) | 0.06 | 3.62 | 3.83 |
SAC (n = 355) | ||||
Positive reappraisal | 2.79 (−0.35) | 0.06 | 2.69 | 2.88 |
Support seeking | 3.95 (0.60) | 0.06 | 3.86 | 4.04 |
Planning | 2.85 (−0.31) | 0.07 | 2.73 | 2.97 |
CAC (n = 131) | ||||
Positive reappraisal | 3.52 (0.83) | 0.10 | 3.35 | 3.69 |
Support seeking | 2.71 (−1.00) | 0.08 | 2.58 | 2.84 |
Planning | 3.43 (0.59) | 0.11 | 3.24 | 3.61 |
LACS, profile of low approach coping strategies; HACS, profile of high approach coping strategies; SAC, profile with a prevalence of social approach coping strategies; CAC, profile with a prevalence of cognitive approach coping strategies. All measurement scales ranged from 1 to 5, where the highest scores reflect a higher level of approach coping strategies. Normalized mean scores are given in brackets (z).