Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;11:841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841

TABLE 4.

Description of latent profiles (means, standard errors, and confidence intervals).

Confidence intervals

M SE Lower 5% Upper 5%
LACS (n = 296)
 Positive reappraisal 2.45 (−0.82) 0.06 2.35 2.55
 Support seeking 2.61 (−1.02) 0.05 2.53 2.69
 Planning 2.42 (−0.88) 0.06 2.33 2.52
HACS (n = 290)
 Positive reappraisal 3.61 (0.89) 0.07 3.49 3.73
 Support seeking 4.07 (0.75) 0.05 3.99 4.16
 Planning 3.72 (1.01) 0.06 3.62 3.83
SAC (n = 355)
 Positive reappraisal 2.79 (−0.35) 0.06 2.69 2.88
 Support seeking 3.95 (0.60) 0.06 3.86 4.04
 Planning 2.85 (−0.31) 0.07 2.73 2.97
CAC (n = 131)
 Positive reappraisal 3.52 (0.83) 0.10 3.35 3.69
 Support seeking 2.71 (−1.00) 0.08 2.58 2.84
 Planning 3.43 (0.59) 0.11 3.24 3.61

LACS, profile of low approach coping strategies; HACS, profile of high approach coping strategies; SAC, profile with a prevalence of social approach coping strategies; CAC, profile with a prevalence of cognitive approach coping strategies. All measurement scales ranged from 1 to 5, where the highest scores reflect a higher level of approach coping strategies. Normalized mean scores are given in brackets (z).