Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;11:841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841

TABLE 5.

Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) corresponding to coping profiles in general self-efficacy.

Coping profiles

LACS HACS SAC CAC
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
General self-efficacy Women 2.73 (0.61) 3.69 (0.55) 3.16 (0.59) 3.62 (0.49)
Men 3.18 (0.53) 3.96 (0.51) 3.43 (0.49) 3.79 (0.63)
Total 2.88 (0.60) 3.78 (0.54) 3.22 (0.58) 3.72 (0.58)

LACS, profile of low approach coping strategies; HACS, profile of high approach coping strategies; SAC, profile with a prevalence of social approach coping strategies; CAC, profile with a prevalence of cognitive approach coping strategies. All measurement scales were from 1 to 5, where the highest scores reflect the highest level of approach coping strategies and general self-efficacy.