TABLE 5.
Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) corresponding to coping profiles in general self-efficacy.
Coping profiles | |||||
LACS | HACS | SAC | CAC | ||
M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | ||
General self-efficacy | Women | 2.73 (0.61) | 3.69 (0.55) | 3.16 (0.59) | 3.62 (0.49) |
Men | 3.18 (0.53) | 3.96 (0.51) | 3.43 (0.49) | 3.79 (0.63) | |
Total | 2.88 (0.60) | 3.78 (0.54) | 3.22 (0.58) | 3.72 (0.58) |
LACS, profile of low approach coping strategies; HACS, profile of high approach coping strategies; SAC, profile with a prevalence of social approach coping strategies; CAC, profile with a prevalence of cognitive approach coping strategies. All measurement scales were from 1 to 5, where the highest scores reflect the highest level of approach coping strategies and general self-efficacy.